OEGlobal 2024

In an academic institution, a strong policy is the foundation that guides operations, mirroring and harmonizing with the strategic direction of the university. At Queensland University of Technology (QUT), an Open Educational Resources (OER) policy was endorsed in 2016, making it one of the first OER policies implemented in an Australian university. Jointly developed by QUT’s Learning and Teaching Unit and the Library, the purpose of the policy is to provide clear direction to the University’s staff and students with relation to the adoption, adaptation, or creation of OERs.

The initial version of the policy supported the development of open educational resources, including some open textbooks. The Library and Learning and Teaching Unit were natural partners in this venture: the Library would support staff to find suitable resources; and the Learning and Teaching Unit would provide technical, curriculum and platform support, as well as strategic consideration. In Semester 2, 2020 the University launched the Open Textbooks with Pressbooks Pilot with the aim of understanding if the Pressbooks publishing platform was fit for purpose in supporting the adoption, adaptation and creation of open textbooks for positive academic and student outcomes.

This pilot, delivered by the Library and the Learning and Teaching Unit, was deemed successful and among the recommendations, Pressbooks is now the endorsed platform for OER creation and adaption at QUT; and the policy received further refinement and changes reflected in the wide range of perspectives and growing expertise.

A strong policy is often the linchpin that ensures consistency, fairness, and accountability in decision-making processes within an academic institution. The QUT OER policy serves as a roadmap, outlining clear expectations, responsibilities and standards for all stakeholders, including faculty, staff, and administrators.

While use and creation of OERs at QUT was slow at first, we appear to be beginning to turn the corner. Momentum is definitely growing at QUT to adopt, adapt, and create open textbooks. Cultural and organisational change can be a gradual process, even when supported by a strong policy. We have found that advocacy efforts and implementation strategies must be aligned to the requirements of teaching staff and the resources available for providing training and support within the institution. It's crucial to minimize barriers to facilitate smooth progress.

This lightning talk focuses on the importance of partnerships in supporting the development of a robust OER policy. In 2024, QUT’s OER policy will be updated again to reflect emerging global practices.



Included in [Session 2D]: Practice and Policy in OE

Author Keywords
open education resources, policy development, partnerships, collaboration

317 words In March 2022, RMIT University, led by the Library, embarked on a two-year project to develop an Open Scholarship Policy. A significant aspect of the project was to establish principles that drew together both open research and open education (OE), reflecting the reality of our academics and higher degree by research candidates who engage in both teaching and research. Significantly, the Policy project team were determined to articulate RMIT’s ambitions about engaging with open educational practices, including open pedagogy and the use and creation of open educational resources such as open textbooks. The outcome of this project is a Policy that provides a framework for the entire RMIT community – students, academics and everyone who supports teaching, learning and research – to create and disseminate knowledge openly and collegially.

This lightning talk will focus on the key processes involved in successfully developing an institutional policy that promotes OE endeavors. A supplementary openly-licensed OE policy project management toolkit will be provided.

The structure of the talk will include a snapshot of the key stages of the project, accompanies by three slides:

Beginning: alignment with RMIT’s new Education Plan; defining open scholarship to include OE and open research; an environmental scan of open scholarship policies in Australia, New Zealand and internationally; and relationship building with OE allies and stakeholders. (4 minutes)

Middle: three core consultative initiatives to invite perspectives, expertise, and feedback from senior staff from university strategic areas including Indigenous Education, Commercialisation and IP, Legal and Strategic Operations, ITS and Procurement, Research and Innovation, Student Equity and Inclusion, and College and School leaders; and the co-design of Policy principles with members of this community. (4 minutes)

Implementation: socialisation of OE with RMIT’s academic, research, teaching and professional communities using University communication channels, outreach programs and targeted initiatives including open textbook publishing. (2 minutes)

Questions: This will include an invitation by the presenter to take questions to follow up at a later time. (5 minutes)



Included in [Session 2D]: Practice and Policy in OE

Author Keywords
open education policies and strategies, open educational practices, open textbooks

The urgency of addressing climate change necessitates a transformation in legal education to ensure future lawyers are equipped to deliver legal services and promote climate justice to a wide range of clients in a climate transformed world. This presentation argues that it is “about time” we use this narrow window to promote climate-conscious pedagogy by integrating open educational resources (OER) into the law education curriculum. The innovative and strategic use of such technologies will enable the mastery of climate-conscious generalist and discipline-specific knowledges, as well as climate-conscious skills, attributes and capabilities in law graduates.

Climate conscious pedagogy will require challenging conventional boundaries and ways of doing things, including changing how we represent diverse communities impacted by climate change and delivering on the kind of recognition justice highlighted by Lambert & Fadel (2022). We outline why and how OER are uniquely crucial for equipping students to navigate a fast-paced and rapidly changing legal environment.

Drawing on a survey of subject coordinators and teachers from across all Australian law schools, this presentation will shine a light on the extent to which climate change is currently being incorporated into the teaching of both compulsory law subjects and electives. While the majority of law school academics emphasised their support for incorporating of climate change considerations into teaching practices, this presentation will delve into individual and institutional factors that limit current capacities, including: perceived knowledge gaps about climate change and climate law, uncertainties about how best to integrate climate change into the existing curriculum, and the lack of space and time in the curriculum to add additional material.

With this background, the presentation will identify opportunities for developing responsive and accessible pedagogical materials and teaching practices to prepare students for their professional lives in light of the global challenge of climate change. To this end, this presentation will introduce the forthcoming open-access textbook, Becoming a Climate Conscious Lawyer: Climate Change and the Australian Legal System. This textbook aims to be an open and zero-cost resource allow students and teachers alike to stay up-to-date with rapid advancements in law related to climate change.



Included in [Session 2B]: Sustainability

References
Lambert, S. R., & Fadel, H. (2022). Open textbooks and social justice: a national scoping study. Perth, Australia, available at: https://www.acses.edu.au/research-policies/15394-2-2/

Author Keywords
Open education resources, Climate change, Legal education, Open access textbook

First Nations voices and perspectives are few and far between within open materials in Australasia. Canada and the United States of America have led the way in this space, with little progress being made in our local region. Charles Darwin University (CDU) in the Northern Territory is wishing to make a difference in this field with the publication in 2024 of two open texts;'Engineering on Country' and 'A Yolnu Philosophy Reader' led by First Nations authors. The rationale, purpose and audiences relating to the creation of these texts will be outlined as will the unique benefits and roadblocks experienced in creating open texts featuring First Nations knowledge and experiences.

Tara Burton, the Open Education Librarian at CDU will discuss the support provided to the authors of the two texts by CDU Library and professional staff. She will unpack practical strategies to employ in collaboration with authors throughout the publication process. This will allow participants to be able to better assist their academics wishing to create open texts featuring First Nations content. Participants will leave the session with some theoretical knowledge and a takeaway mini toolkit with templates, tips and resources to implement in their open practice.

This lightning talk will provide participants with a greater awareness of how to approach the creation and support of First Nations open texts from the perspective of a smaller, remote university which caters for TAFE, higher education and research sectors. The First Nations open texts at CDU are designed to be used across all sectors of the university and beyond, as the engineering and Yolnu content can be used within industry and business in the Northern Territory, as well as within Australia and in other countries. Crocodiles, cyclones, laksas, the build-up and humidity are not the only things we wish to be known for in the Northern Territory, with the emerging representation of our First Nations voices in open texts presenting an exciting addition to this wonderful place.

Charles Darwin University believes in ‘honouring Australian First Nations knowledges and cultures’ and ‘fostering a culture of inclusion and belonging and valuing our diversity’ (Charles Darwin University, 2021-2026) as outlined in the University’s Strategic Plan which lends itself well to the creation of open materials in this space and the Conference theme of 'Open Is Everyone’s Business'. 30% of the Northern Territory’s population are First Nations peoples with 13% of CDU’s commencing Higher Education students identifying as Indigenous which is higher than the national average Indigenous population of 3%. These statistics highlight both the need and opportunity for CDU to be at the forefront of creating open materials aimed at this student cohort and in bringing First Nations content to the international stage in an accessible way.

CDU is committed as an open educational practitioner, creators and supporters, to ensuring that Australia’s indigenous voices are more widely represented in our open materials. We encourage you to join us in making sure 'Open Is Everyone’s Business' and in closing this important gap in open education.



Included in [Session 2C]: First Nations, Equity

References
Charles Darwin University. (2021-2026). Charles Darwin University Strategic Plan 2021-2026.

Kutay, C., Maher, G., Bertei, S., Boye, T., Rupa Deva, S., Hughes, M., Leigh, E. & McArdle, P. (2024). Engineering on Country. Charles Darwin University.

Wanambi, G., Hayashi, Y. & Christie, M. (2024). A Yolnu Philosophy Reader. Charles Darwin University.

Author Keywords
First Nations perspectives, Local Indigenous cultures and ways of knowing, Open educational practices, Open textbooks

Kwantlen Polytechnic University has a world-wide reputation for being a leader in Open Education. KPU is often seen as an early adopter of new initiatives and as a place where institutional supports make work in Open Ed easier. Colleagues from around the world often come to us with questions about our programs and processes.

However, like in any institution KPU’s Open Education journey has had its challenges, its ups and downs, as well as victories and celebrations. We have had to work together to come up with solutions to new problems as our programs grew, and deal with all the other normal challenges that institutions have to deal with. This lightning talk will discuss KPU’s open education journey, its successes and struggles, how the resilience of our team has helped us pull through and adapt, and provides a glimpse into our future plans.

We will touch on the beginnings of Open Education at KPU, when most work was done in specific departments by faculty champions as well as in the library by passionate librarians, and eventually in an open education working group. This was followed by a period of formalization, with the creation of the position of special advisor to the provost on open education and the creation of the open education office. The library set up a more formal open publishing program, with dedicated staff. Eventually KPU created a higher administrative position for Open Education, and the hiring of open education strategists meant that work was further formalized and expanded. The work on our Zero Textbook Cost programs expanded exponentially, our Open education grants evolved and expanded in several ways, and our publishing program grew.

Both challenges and opportunities arose as Open was further integrated in the wider KPU system. The AVP Open Education position ceased to exist, and the Open Education office was terminated and rolled in the Teaching and Learning Commons. This ensured that it had an integral place in the university but also gave it a smaller presence overall. We lost one of our open education strategist positions but gained more focus from the Director of Learning Technologies & Educational Development, as well as more support for administrative tasks. The library team saw several retirements, leaves, and key persons stepping away from Open Education work, positions that were not backfilled. The Open Education Working Group was disbanded and replaced by a grant adjudication committee with a narrower scope.

These changes have also brought opportunities, as our resilient team sought collaborations with other groups, such as students, deans, and liaison librarians, and worked to further streamline and integrate our processes with those of the wider university. The creativity of the KPU community means that we are confident in the sustainability of Open Ed at our institutions and hopeful about its future.



Included in [Session 2B]: Sustainability

Author Keywords
sustainability, open education policies and strategies, open practitioners

Learning in communities aligns with the concept of continuous learning which is relevant for the Dutch defense organization. A concept of openness supports, in-company communities of practice co-creating online modules and learning materials accessible and (re)usable to any employee in the organization via an online platform called The Open Defence Academy. Although from a traditional point of view learning begins when professionals are able to engage with modules and learning materials, this participative action research has its focus on learning in communities through collaborative design processes and expressed in terms of value.

Both communities of practice and social learning spaces are valuable theoretical concepts that help with building the framework for this research. They offer a lens to describe and research learning through participation in social practices. It allows a unique perspective on work-related processes as being perceived as learning processes. Collaborations in design groups for open modules and learning materials offer insights into the dynamics of these groups, their formation and processes that lead to learning, or can even undermine learning.

The theoretical concepts of communities of practice and social learning spaces are positioned in a context of openness. A contemporary perspective on openness in education offers opportunities for community involvement in design- and dissemination activities of learning materials. Due to perspectives on openness, the dichotomy between formal, nonformal and informal learning becomes permeable which offers opportunities to rephrase learning into terms of value. The development of value in collaborative module design groups appears through a continuous process of participation which implies learning. Value is a product of this participatory process and is developed due to the existence of agency among participants and their ability to negotiate meaning. It is expressed in terms of immediate-, potential-, applied- and realized value.

With a mixed methods approach learning through collaborative design in groups of stakeholders is explored and mapped supported by the value creation framework. These methods are mainly qualitative and involve interviews, focus group sessions, visual representations created on MIRO boards and notes from the researcher’s reflexive journal. The focus group questions and interview questions are developed and inspired on the critical incident technique. Expansion of learning in the wider communities is explored using a questionnaire send to those in the communities who got involved in (online) activities regarding the design process, for example discussions, brainstorm sessions or script writing. At the time of this conference, it is expected that the first data is analyzed. A more detailed set up of this research and the preliminary results will be shared.



Included in [Session 2B]: Sustainability

Author Keywords
Open Educational Practices, Workplace learning, Lifelong and informal learning

In this lightning talk, the Open Education Librarian from the University of Canterbury (UC) in New Zealand will outline some key milestones to date on the UC Library’s ongoing journey towards establishing an Open Educational Resources (OER) publication support service for academic staff. This narrative highlights the strategic steps, challenges, successes and progress so far in the journey toward an environment where OER adoption and creation thrive. By sharing experiences, the Open Education Librarian will provide insights and ideas for other institutions seeking to enhance their educational offerings through OER, who may be in the initial stages, or wondering where to start.

This session aims to spark ideas about possible ways to get started by sharing some of the steps UC took to get to their current position (currently around 2-3 on the OER maturity model https://pressbooks.com/news/maturity-model-for-open-education/) and their plans for the future. What will be covered:

• initial advocacy and outreach work
• open publishing via the university’s institutional repository
• working together with the University Press to publish open texts
• setting up a grant program to support authors to publish open texts
• establishing a dedicated OER librarian position
• participation in the CAUL collective and publishing via Pressbooks
• where UC are now, and what’s coming up

Alongside this, participants will also hear about an individual librarian’s learning journey into Open publishing, and the experience of building and developing knowledge and skills in an unfamiliar field and navigating a new role while advancing an Open text publishing support service.



Included in [Session 2A]: Open Publishing (Workshop and lightning talks)

References
Growing Up: A Maturity Model for Open Education | Pressbooks https://pressbooks.com/news/maturity-model-for-open-education/

Author Keywords
library publishing, open education resources (OER), open textbook publishing

In 2022 the University of Newcastle Library joined CAUL’s OER Collective as a member institution. Members of our team participated in the OER Foundations training. We were ready to support our academic staff create open textbooks!

While we had some interested academic staff, their content was either non-existent, or needed a lot of work which they had no resources to supply. Institutional workload and IP policies were also barriers. We were stuck.

Our solution grew from activities already being undertaken within the Academic Engagement Team, and aligned with our Library Indigenous Strategic Plan. We would forge ahead and create our own open guide to Indigenising Teaching, Learning and the Student Experience. We knew that content existed or was being written. That content would align perfectly with the values of open educational resources – social justice, equity, continuous sharing of knowledge.

We found that creators from across the university were keen to contribute. One aspect they really appreciated was that they didn’t have to contribute an entire chapter. We asked for case studies and examples of the use of Indigenous pedagogies within classes and courses. We also asked students to describe their experiences engaging with Western and Indigenous pedagogies.

Library staff supported academic authors and created content about the work the library has done to implement yarning circles within an international student program, the creation of a guide to the Voice Referendum in 2023, Indigenised spaces (digital and physical) within the library, introducing services such as yarning kits for loan, and more.

Contributors were excited to learn about the OER Collective’s use of Pressbooks, an open platform which protects their authorship but allows redistribution, remixing and reuse of content. They wanted their content to be published, not just to share but to adapt and contextualise to specific situations while protected by Creative Commons licensing. By thinking beyond the traditional idea of a textbook, we were able to gather high-quality content to fulfill our commitment to publish six chapters of the guide. As with all open textbooks, the guide is open to feedback and evaluation. As far as the project team is aware, this is the first Australian guide to Indigenising teaching, learning and the student experience in higher education.

The contributors and project team hope that this guide will inform the Indigenisation of curricula across higher education in Australia providing a template for introducing different pedagogical methods to improve engagement and retention of a larger, more diverse cohort of students, while improving the cultural capability of institutions for their students and staff.

We are also using the guide as a pilot to demonstrate the value and impact of open textbooks, to encourage our teaching community to develop their own.



Included in [Session 2A]: Open Publishing (Workshop and lightning talks)

Author Keywords
First Nations perspectives, Inclusion diversity equity and access, Local Indigenous cultures and ways of knowing, Open textbooks

In response to growing demand from academics requiring resources on Artificial Intelligence (AI) for their students, Charles Sturt Librarians developed an Open Education Resource (OER) titled Using AI tools at university. This resource aims to equip university students and researchers with the knowledge and skills necessary to utilise AI tools productively, ethically and responsibly. Our project, undertaken collaboratively by Charles Sturt Librarians, seeks to democratise access to AI literacy.

Generative AI technologies and AI tools for research are increasingly prevalent in academic settings, yet students and researchers often lack guidance on the responsible and ethical use and how they can be used productively. Our OER addresses this gap by providing comprehensive information on AI tools, their applications, and ethical considerations. The resource emphasises the importance of understanding AI biases, data privacy, and the ethical implications of AI-driven decisions.

The benefits of OER for students are extensive. Research indicates that using OER enhances student learning (Cheung, 2019) and serves as an effective learning intervention by providing equal access to educational resources for all students (Grimaldi et al., 2019). Open textbooks can be continuously and easily updated to remain relevant, which is especially crucial given the rapid advancements in AI. Considering the importance of equitable access to information for our students and the challenges posed by traditional publishing models, such as high costs and restrictive licensing, OER offers valuable resources that ensure equitable access for all students.

The Pressbooks platform was used and incorporated interactive media and active learning through H5P. It seamlessly embedded in the learning management system plus allowed direct linking to specific chapters, when students had assessment requirements requiring specific AI literate information and evaluation. The project not only provided specific resources at the request of academics needing information on AI use for their students assessment tasks but was expanded to provide a complete AI literacy resource that can be used by all undertaking research. It covers algorithmic literacy (Ridley & Pawlick-Potts, 2021), understanding bias, developing competency in critical ignoring (Kozyreva et al., 2023), detecting hallucinations and communicating with AI through effective prompt engineering (Lo, 2023).

The project also had a secondary objective to familarise Librarians with developing content for an OER with then having a locally produced OER to demonstrate to academics. This initiative aligns with the broader movement towards open education and the sharing of knowledge across institutions.

Our OER, Using AI tools at university, empowers students from diverse backgrounds to engage actively with AI tools. By breaking down complex concepts into understandable modules, we foster responsible AI use and encourage student contributions to AI development. Moving forward, we aim to expand this resource and integrate it into existing digital literacy modules across disciplines. This integration will support the development of critical thinking and digital literacy skills, preparing students for the evolving digital landscape.



Included in [Session 3D]: Digital Capability, Artificial Intelligence

References
Cheung, S. K. S. (2019). A Study on the University Students’ Use of Open Educational Resources for Learning Purposes. Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations (pp. 146-155). Springer Singapore.

Grimaldi, P. J., Basu Mallick, D., Waters, A. E., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2019). Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PloS One, 14(3), e0212508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212508

Kozyreva, A., Wineburg, S., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). Critical ignoring as a core competence for digital citizens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221121570

Lo, L. S. (2023). The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720

Ridley, M., & Pawlick-Potts, D. (2021). Algorithmic literacy and the role for libraries. Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 40(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12963

Author Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Literacy, Open Educational Resources, GenAI, Digital Literacy, AI Literacy, OER, Open Textbooks

This presentation will share the results of an assessment of the capacity to support open educational practices (OEP) of the colleges, universities, and Indigenous institutes in Ontario, Canada.

This system-wide survey is the first application of the ISAT 2, an institutional self-assessment tool to assess capacity to support OEP in higher education. This multidimensional instrument builds on earlier research in British Columbia (Morgan et al., 2021) and the Netherlands (van Rossum & Schuwer, 2022) and assesses capacity and maturity related to: vision and implementation; partnerships, policies, and incentives; professional development; institutional supports; leadership and advocacy; and culture change. The ISAT2 is openly licensed and available in English and French.

This tool aids institutions in evaluating their current support for OEP and provides actionable strategies to enhance pedagogical practices and resources. By offering insights from our survey of public universities, colleges, and Indigenous institutes in Ontario, we will highlight how ISAT2 can support institutions in leveraging OEP to widen equitable access and democratize the learning process in service of societal transformation.



Included in [Session 3B]: First Nations

References
Morgan, T., Childs, E., Hendricks, C., Harrison, M., DeVries, I., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2021). How are we doing with open education practice initiatives? Applying an institutional self-assessment tool in five higher education institutions. The International Review of Open and Distributed Learning, 22(4), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i4.5745

van Rossum, L. & Schuwer, R. (2022). Quickscan open educational practices. https://www.versnellingsplan.nl/en/Kennisbank/quickscan-open-educational-practices/

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Open educational resources, Open education policies and strategies, Higher education

Over the last three decades, open educational practices have emerged as a field of both practice and research. In the language of this year’s theme, Open is Everyone’s Business, and business is booming. This boom has spurred institutionalization through myriad published papers, specialized journals, even dedicated classes and courses of study. But this institutionalization raises many questions, especially in regards to course offerings: are there regular courses offered in open educational practices, and if so, where are they taught and what do they include? Are courses on open education the purview of dedicated departments or centres, into transdisciplinary programs like Digital Humanities, or housed under the umbrella of education departments? To what extent are courses in open education inclusive of diverse perspectives and ways of knowing? Are courses on open educational practices taught using open educational practices? To answer these questions, I’ll conduct bibliographic and curricular analyses. I’ll construct a database (that will be shared openly) of courses by searching college catalogs, starting with those listed in Boston College’s Worldwide Higher Education Inventory (“Worldwide Higher Education Inventory), and US News’ list of top education programs in the US (“Best Universities”) as well as the English-speaking institutions on US News’ list of global universities (“Top Education”) and open universities such as the UK’s Open University and Canada’s Athabasca University. To cast the widest possible net, I will add the institutions of leading scholars (drawn from those who have keynoted open education conferences and/or publish frequently in open education journals) and emerging scholars (drawn from the members of the Global OER Graduate Network). Finally, I will email the initial database to multiple list-servs that focus on open education to request information on any institutions and courses of which their members are aware.

Once the list is assembled, I will search each institutions’ course catalogs to find any courses that have the search terms “open education,” “open educational resources,” “OER,” “open pedagogy,” and/or “open educational practices” in the title or course description to find out which institutions are offering courses, in what departments, as part of which degrees, and whether the courses are regular course offerings or special topics courses. Course syllabi and degree maps/courses of study that focus on open education will be requested from the instructors of the identified courses for content analysis to identify what topics are covered, what readings/materials are assigned, and what these courses say about the current state of the field of open education. Mapping where and how courses in open education are offered as well as what topics and readings these courses include, will provide insight as to what the field of research in open education truly is at this moment in time.

This proposal overlaps several of the possible proposal areas: *Open practitioners, identity, and space in education *Open data *Open educational practices, including open assessment *Inclusion, diversity, equity, and access to Open Education Resources (OER) and Open Education Practices (OEP)



Included in [Session 3E]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
“Best Universities in the US for Education Degrees 2024.” 2023. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/best-universities/best-universities-us-education-degrees.

“Top Education and Educational Research Schools in the World - US News Education.” n.d. Accessed December 13, 2023. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/education-educational-research.

“Worldwide Higher Education Inventory - Lynch School of Education and Human Development - Boston College.” https://www.bc.edu/content/bc-web/schools/lynch-school/sites/cihe/research-resources/worldwide-higher-education-inventory.html.

Author Keywords
open educational practices, open practitioners, open curriculum, open syllabi

The focus of our presentation will be on the interdepartmental collaboration in creating an Open Educational Resource (textbook) for business students at IBS University (Papua New Guinea), and the stages of the design, development and publishing process. Background context: SCU and IBSU have been in educational partnership for over 20 years. SCU’s move to the Southern Cross model of delivery (the shorter, more focused unit structure, delivered over six weeks) necessitated redesign of the existing, co-delivered, business units for IBSU students. Whereas open educational resources have been present in education for over four decades, it is over the last 10 years that they have gained momentum in the tertiary sector as “a powerful tool for reducing inequalities of educational opportunity and promoting innovative strategies to improve educational problems” (Bliss and Smith, 2017, pp. 9-10). This point of view informed our decision to design and develop an Open Educational Resource (textbook) for SCU/IBSU students in Port Moresby. In December 2023, Library Services, Centre for Teaching and Learning, and Business School academics (from Australia and Papua New Guinea) started a working group with the goal to design and develop an OER textbook for the unit Introduction to the Business Law of Papua New Guinea. The group had regular meetings every fortnight, and responsibilities were: academics were responsible for writing the content, Centre for Teaching and Learning for educational/learning design, and Library Services for administrative and publishing process. We made every attempt in the design stage to place the focus on the Papua New Guinea students’ point of view; our design was informed by the teaching experiences of academics from SCU/IBSU, the students’ feedback on their learning experiences in previous deliveries of the unit, and our visit ISB University. This was achieved through regular (fortnightly) discussions on specificities of the educational environment in PNG and collaborative analysis of students’ feedback form. All decisions in this stage were guided by student-centred design and the Universal Design principles to maximise usability for a wide variety of individuals. In the writing stage, academics produced the content and suggested the corresponding activities. Activities were designed and collectively evaluated for their usefulness and friendliness of use (with student engagement in mind). The development stage included bringing in the digital design expert to consult on story lines (for proposed animations) and a colleague from PNG to advise on images and interpretation of the visuals. The end result is an OER textbook that is easy to use by students, easily scalable, and enhances the unit content and increases student engagement and interaction with the learning material. NB: We expect to have the textbook ‘published’ in July, so we will be able to show it to the audience.



Included in [Session 3E]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Bliss, T J and Smith, M. 2017. A Brief History of Open Educational Resources. In: Jhangiani, R S and Biswas-Diener, R. (eds.) Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science. Pp. 9–27. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.b. License: CC-BY 4.0
Liu, C., & Elms, P. (2019). Animating student engagement : The impacts of cartoon instructional videos on learning experience. Research in learning technology, 27, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2124

Author Keywords
inclusion diversity equity and access, open access publishing, open educational practices, open textbook, social justice

This study explores the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into robotics programming education to enrich inquiry-based science learning, particularly in the STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) domains, with a focus on its impact on elementary science education. Through hands-on STEAM activities, students enhance problem-solving skills, collaboration, and develop a strong interest in science learning. Utilizing Scratch, a free and open programming language, students not only learn programming basics but also deepen their understanding and application of scientific concepts. The research targets elementary school students, incorporating technology, mathematics, and physical education into a series of STEAM education experiments. Results underscore the importance of open educational resources in supporting STEAM education, enhancing scientific learning, fostering creativity, and teamwork, thereby positively influencing educational equity and quality. The example of a baseball robot illustrates the potential benefits and challenges of utilizing open educational resources.

Inquiry-based science learning encourages questioning, investigation, and knowledge construction through exploration and experimentation. Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence, especially Generative AI (GenAI), offer novel tools to enhance this educational approach. This paper examines how integrating GenAI can enrich the learning experience, focusing on a STEAM project involving the design and implementation of a baseball robot.

Utilizing the 6E experiential learning model, GenAI assumes multiple roles across the learning stages. Initially, in the Engage phase, GenAI acts as a catalyst, captivating student interest through Scratch, thereby igniting curiosity. In the subsequent Explore phase, GenAI transitions into a mentor, providing tailored learning pathways and resources, facilitating guided exploration. As the learning progresses into the Explain phase, GenAI transforms into an instructor, simplifying intricate concepts and theories through textual content. During the Engineer phase, GenAI serves as a design assistant, assisting students in utilizing tools like LEGO SPIKE for project development. Moving forward to the Enrich phase, GenAI becomes an inspiration, expanding students' knowledge and fostering interdisciplinary integration and innovative thinking. Finally, in the Evaluate phase, GenAI transitions into an assessor, delivering real-time feedback and assessments to aid students and teachers in reviewing and reflecting on learning outcomes. GenAI plays a crucial role in scientific inquiry activities, offering expertise, guidance, and support throughout the project phases, thereby enriching students' learning experiences and fostering knowledge exchange in STEAM fields.

The combination of GenAI and Open Educational Resources (OER) in STEAM education enhances learning by personalizing pathways, improving accessibility, and ensuring quality education for all. This model fosters students' passion for science and technology, enhances problem-solving skills, and cultivates future innovators. It demonstrates the potential of Generative AI in modern education, emphasizing the importance of open education in global learning initiatives.



Included in [Session 3D]: Digital Capability, Artificial Intelligence

References
Burke, D. (2014). E byDeSGN" Model. Chiou, G.-L., Lee, M.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). High school students’ approaches to learning physics with relationship to epistemic views on physics and conceptions of learning physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.794134

García-Carmona, A. (2020). From Inquiry-Based Science Education to the Approach Based on Scientific Practices. Science & Education, 29(2), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00108-8

Hwang, G.-J., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students' learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008

Inguva, P., Shah, P., Shah, U., & Brechtelsbauer, C. (2021). How to Design Experiential Learning Resources for Independent Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(4), 1182-1192. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00990

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Kuen-Yi Lin, H.-S. H., P. John Williams & Yu-Han Chen. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561432

Li, X., Muniz, M., Chun, K., Tai, J., Guerra, F., & York, D. M. (2022). Inquiry-Based Activities and Games That Engage Students in Learning Atomic Orbitals. J Chem Educ, 99(5), 2175-2181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01023

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational_and_self_regulated_learning. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

States, N. L. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/18290

Wang, H.-H., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314636

Author Keywords
STEAM, Programming Education, Exploratory Learning, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Computational Thinking

Whereas traditional definitions of open pedagogy have included writing textbooks or creating quiz banks, this lightning talk describes an innovative way of having students explore course concepts in Psychology courses: creating abstract art related to the concepts. The presenter will share examples from her classes and discuss the ways she has learned to scaffold students' production of art related to course concepts. She will also share student reflections on the projects.



Included in [Session 4C]: Open Pedagogy

Author Keywords
open pedagogy, multimodal learning, student feedback, cross-disciplinary collaboration

This design-based research study investigated the effectiveness of using MOOC scaffolds with translanguaging integrated to enhance self-regulated learning (SRL) and English as a lingua franca (ELF) proficiency in high school students learning in English-medium instruction (EMI) MOOCs. The study focused on students facing the dual barriers of ELF proficiency and online learning. The recent adoption of the English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) policy in Taiwan targets the education sectors across all ages, endeavoring to internationalize the educational landscape through rapid EMI penetration, underscored by the need for comprehensive teacher support as educators transition to this new instructional medium.

Culturally responsive MOOCs have gained attention in recent years for their potential to support diverse learners globally. However, there needs to be more literature regarding wrapping English-taught MOOCs with a scaffolding, translanguaging MOOC, which could provide a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for bilingual students. This niche in “wrapped” MOOCs represents an opportunity for further research and development, as it could enhance MOOCs' effectiveness in catering to students' diverse linguistic needs. By incorporating translanguaging practices and culturally responsive content, wrapped MOOCs could potentially bridge the gap between monolingual English-taught courses and the diverse linguistic backgrounds of learners, fostering a more inclusive and practical learning experience.

We developed five design-based research objectives in this study:

• Realize translanguaging and self-regulated learning scaffolds into the EMI MOOCs.
• Initiate a design team to prototype the “wrapped” course activities for the EMI MOOCs.
• Implement the prototype as two courses on one of Taiwan’s MOOC platforms to evaluate learning activities and improve the developed course activities based on learner feedback.
• Encompass the other six courses across SDGs to observe EMI students’ practice and engagement when taking the wrapped EMI MOOCs in different areas.
• Develop research-supported instructional practice for translanguaging scaffoldings MOOCs and its continuing growth.

The present study embodies design-based research (DBR), whose main characteristic is balancing theory and practice, necessitating careful planning and arrangement. To realize “theory-in-context”, EMI scaffolds and online learner scaffolds were implemented in the 2022-2023 program of virtual overseas study tours (VOST) in MOOCs. The ewant-based learning activities were designed to collect student reflections by stage and in a mixed form of idea presentation (i.e., words and snapshots), thereby being able to scaffold EMI MOOC experiences at all stages, following structured class arrangements for FutureLearn courses. To understand learners’ attitudes toward VOST in iteration 3, a 75-item Likert scale survey was administered, including English as a Lingua Franca; Online Self-Regulated Learning; Learning Engagement; program satisfaction; and open-ended questions. The questionnaire measured functional beliefs and attitudes about communication and competence in learning and speaking English as an international language, SRL in online learning environments, learners' attitudes toward teachers, course requirements, expectations, and willingness to learn online.

Our findings suggest that translanguaging MOOC scaffolds can effectively improve ELF attitude and self-regulation in high school students learning through EMI MOOCs. In other words, using these scaffolds may help students overcome the dual barriers of ELF proficiency and online learning. (496 words).



Included in [Session 6D]: Open Pedagogy, Repositories

References
Chen, K. Z., & Oakley, B. (2020). Redeveloping a global MOOC to be more locally relevant: Design-based research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0178-6 Graham, K. M., & Yeh, Y-F. (2023). Teachers’ implementation of bilingual education in Taiwan: Challenges and arrangements: Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09791-4 Helm, F. (2020). EMI, internationalisation, and the digital. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23, 314-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1643823 Ho, J. & Tai, K.W.H. (2021). Translanguaging in digital learning: The making of translanguaging spaces in online English teaching videos. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2001427

Author Keywords
High school students, English-medium instruction (EMI), Mass Open Online Courses (MOOCs), self-regulated learning, English as lingua franca

This exploration is inspired by a famous experiment performed by the German physicist and musician, Ernst Florens Friedrich Chladni. He lived from 1756 to 1827 and is called the father of Acoustics because of his work on vibrating plates. He demonstrated the visualization of the nodal lines by sprinkling a layer of powder onto the surface of the vibrating plate. These observed patterns are called Chladni patterns.

This research is based on state-of-the-art theory to develop software for virtually emulating the nodal lines of a vibrating plate. The main aim is to provide a digital and open-source platform to assist students in learning the resonance phenomena of a vibrating plate. By using the developed platform, students can dynamically visualize the nodal-line formation of a vibrating plate without physical equipment. Since the developed simulator can be operated anytime and anywhere with a personal computer, it can greatly reduce the time required for the physical experiment. Furthermore, the dynamic visualization technology makes the educational process more convenient, expands the number of participants, and deepens the understanding of physical insights. The developed platform can be used in classrooms as well as informal places. Consequently, enables lifelong learning for anyone, makes physics education more diverse and inclusive, makes scientific education more diverse and interesting, and especially reduces educational gaps between urban and rural regions, and makes education more equitable for the general public, as well as enhances access to physics knowledge and digital education.

Since traditional Chladni plate resonance experiments often require a large amount of materials and complex equipment that are not available to every region or student, this research developed simulation software to solve the problem of difficult access to resources. Compared with existing similar works in the world (such as ShaderToy, and thelig.ht Chladni experiment), the simulation software developed in this research can provide users with a learning environment of interactivity and diversity. Through advanced audio processing technology, this simulator can produce a sense of presence, especially the realism of the sand movement and the resonant sound. Users can freely adjust the parameters of the experiment to observe and experience the realistic changes. Moreover, the developed simulator also provides users with the functions of image and data storage for further numerical analyses and scientific investigations, and then learn the principles of physics in depth. T

o sum up, the digital simulation tool developed in this research not only reduces the complexity of the experiments but also provides the functionality for distance education. The open-source nature of the simulator allows users to further customize this software according to their teaching and experiential needs, thereby making more contributions and sharing it for the education field.



Included in [Session 6D]: Open Pedagogy, Repositories

References
1. Tuan, P.H.; Wen, C.P.; Yu, Y.T.; Liang, H.C.; Huang, K.F.; Chen, Y.F. Exploring the distinction between experimental resonant modes and theoretical eigenmodes: From vibrating plates to laser cavities. Phys. Rev. E 2014, 89, 022911. 2. Tuan, P.H.; Wen, C.P.; Chiang, P.Y.; Yu, Y.T.; Liang, H.C.; Huang, K.F.; Chen, Y.F. Exploring the resonant vibration of thin plates: reconstruction of Chladni patterns and determination of resonant wave numbers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2015, 137, 2113. 3. Tseng, Y.-C.; Hsu, Y.-H.; Lai Y.-H.; Yu, Y.-T.; Liang, H.-C.; Huang, K.-F.; Chen, Y.-F. Exploiting Modern Chladni Plates to Analogously Manifest the Point . Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10094. 4. Dashti, S.; Prakash, E.; Navarro-Newball, AA.; Hussain, F.; Carroll, F. Chladni Plate Visualisation. (2022) 5. Yucel, V.; Yildan, I. Form Follows Algorithm: Differentiation of Chladni Patterns through Mathematical Functions in Processing . PROC 20 GENERATIVE A (2017) 6. Viktor M. Formation of Chladni patterns in virtual environment. November (2017)

Author Keywords
Educational equity, Open-source educational tools, Chladni Plates, Digital simulation, Resonance phenomena, Interactive learning, Dynamic visualization

The financial services sector emphases initiatives that empower consumers in an increasingly and diverse financial system. One of the areas of initiative is that of consumer education, which includes the provision of numerous financial education programmes by many stakeholders. Financial education can benefit any age person and irrespective of their income level (OECD, 2005). The changing nature of financial products and their increasing complexity are among the many reasons for financial education becoming increasingly important (FCSA, 2020). In South Africa educating financial consumers and potential financial consumers is legislated in terms of the Financial Sector Regulation Act, 2017 (Act No. 9 of 2017) (FSR Act). In terms of this Act the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) is responsible for this education. A project is currently underway to develop a South African financial education portal. The aim of the South African financial education portal project is to encourage the financial services industry to work collaboratively to identify opportunities to consolidate existing resources into a sustainable programme. The South African financial education portal is planned to consist of four segments, a repository of financial education content, accreditation of financial education resources (a Quality Mark), certification of financial education providers and an evidence hub. The proposed online platform will be designed through the application of a living lab integrative approach (Mastelic, 2019), underpinned by design thinking. As per the integrative approach, the first step of the research project is in the ‘Problem space phase’ following a sequential multi-method research approach. Empathise is the first stage in design thinking and in living lab research researchers try to gain a deep understanding of the problems and motivations of the end user. The context is researched, to gain an understanding of user behaviours, perceptions, and social practices.

Ramsunder & Mathiva (2020) found in a desk top study, that most programmes offered by institutions are generic in nature, in South Africa. This research aims to answer two questions How can educational resources be shared amongst institutions and how then can a culture of collaboration of financial education materials be encouraged so that potentially limited budgets are utilised more efficiently? This paper will present the exploration of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and open educational resources in the financial service sector and how to encourage a culture of collaboration to enhance the efficiency and quality of the provision of consumer financial education.



Included in [Session 6A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
FCSA (2020). Discussion Document: Ensuring Appropriate Financial Consumer Education Initiatives. https://www.moonstone.co.za/upmedia/uploads/library/Moonstone%20Library/MS%20Industry%20News/1.%20Discussion%20Document%20-%20Ensuring%20Appropriate%20Financial%20Education%20Initiatives_June2020.pdf Mastelic, J. (2019). Stakeholders’ engagement in the co-design of energy conservation interventions: The case of the Energy Living Lab. OECD (2005). Improving Financial Literacy. Analysis of Issues and Policies. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/improving-financial-literacy_9789264012578-en#page6 Ramsunder, J. and Mthivha, F.(2020). Trends in consumer financial education in South Africa. https://dnaeconomics.com/trends-in-consumer-financial-education-in-south-africa/

Author Keywords
Open educational resources, corporate social responsibility, financial consumer education

The current study utilized Lambert's 3R framework of social justice (redistributive, recognitive, and representational justice) to investigate the impact of justice frames and open educational practices in syllabus design on undergraduate students' perceptions. Participants (n=207) viewed several versions of a hypothetical syllabus, with each version increasing in social justice focus. Participants then answered questionnaires on their intent to take the course, student sense of belonging, and instructor evaluation.

We hypothesized that with each consecutive version of the syllabus, reflecting an increased focus on social justice, (1) Student sense of belonging will increase, (2) Instructor evaluation will become more positive, (3) Intent to register for the course will be more likely, and (4) These relationships will be moderated by the number of marginalized identities experienced by participants.

This study underscores the importance of incorporating social justice frameworks into syllabus design to enhance student engagement and perceptions of inclusivity.



Included in [Session 6A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Social justice, Course design, Higher education

Collaboration is pivotal to expanding the reach and adoption of open educational practices, especially when growing the Open movement throughout a region from grassroots. The ASCILITE Australasian Open Educational Practice Special Interest Group (OEP SIG) is a community hub for Open practitioners throughout the Australasian region. One of the OEP SIG’s key activities is the production of the monthly OEP Digest, collaboratively curated by a dedicated team of open education practitioners geographically distributed across Australia.

Since its inception in 2018, inspired by SPARC’s OER Digest, the Australasian OEP Digest has been raising awareness of open education principles and practices in Australasia, providing a vehicle to highlight professional development resources, project opportunities, local learnings and the achievements of pioneering open education practitioners. Published through the OEP SIG website, the Digest takes its cues from the OEP SIG community, continuously evolving to curate resources and updates relevant to the Australasian open education landscape and delivering an easily accessible summary of OEP content straight to the inbox of approximately 200 subscribers.

In this session, join the OEP Digest curators for a reflection on: - The origins, philosophy and development of this community-centric newsletter - Navigating the process, challenges and unanticipated benefits of working as a cross-institutional team of academic librarians from four Australian higher education institutions, each with open education programs at varying levels of maturity - Strategies for using a publication such as the Digest to advance open education in your institution

The Digest team makes Open everyone’s business by providing a platform that invites, elevates and celebrates community voices, curates a diverse range of readings, resources and professional development opportunities, and promotes the latest open textbooks relevant to Australasian educational institutions.

While the Digest has an Australasian focus, highlighting locally developed resources, many international resources and opportunities are included to ensure readers understand and remain connected with the global nature of open education. In a field where practitioners can often feel isolated and unsure of how to move forward, the OEP Digest brings us together, celebrates us, and reminds us we’re not doing this alone. Because Open is everyone’s business.



Included in [Session 6A]: Practice and Policy in OE

Author Keywords
Open access publishing, Open educational practices, Open education policies and strategies, Open practitioners, Open textbooks

The University of Technology, the Learner Experience Design team adopted a strategy to make Open Educational Practices (OEP) integral to everyone's role by emphasising professional development. In higher education, professional development is described as the process of enhancing the skills and competencies of staff necessary for facilitating and enhancing the student learning experience. According to Havea & Mohanty (2020) professional development contributes to sustainable development by improving the skills and competencies of individuals, which in turn enhances workforce quality and productivity. This is also in alignment with the sustainable development goals under 2030 Development agenda, which underscores the importance of building higher education staff capacity in content, pedagogical and technological knowledge (Mishra and Koehler, 2006). At its core, the UTS strategy of sustainable partnerships fosters a culture of engagement and collaboration within UTS and the external community (n.d, UTS). While the impact of engaging in OEP has primarily been realised through cost-cutting with open textbooks, at UTS, we see that OEP can further enhance the student learning experience. This is achieved not only by reducing costs of textbooks but also by promoting inclusivity, engaging our learning and teaching community, and building capacity in open education. In this presentation, I’ll highlight the efforts made by a learning and teaching central team at UTS to advocate for OEP through professional development. Our efforts were focused on the following six areas: Resources and Blogs: We curated a resource collection where academics can openly share their teaching approaches. Additionally, our blog series dedicated to open education serves as a platform to advocate for OEP

Community Engagement: UTS Learning Design Meetup has been instrumental in starting the conversation on OE. This initiative has inspired various university units and academics to publish OER focusing on Learning Design and Sustainability. Furthermore, we have successfully encouraged academics to create their own open textbooks and apply for open textbook grants. Projects for Scalable Impact (Central Team): We formed specialised squads focusing on Open Education (OE) and H5P OERHub, facilitating collaborative efforts towards impactful outcomes. Moreover, in partnership with the UTS library, we were able to contribute to the development of open-access policy procedures addressing technological infrastructure needs and OEP in learning and teaching. Workshops: Our OEP workshops have been instrumental in raising a culture of sharing educational materials within and outside UTS. Global Events: UTS proudly hosted Open Education Week in both 2023 and 2024, showcasing our institution's global presence and commitment to open education initiatives. Creative Commons Licensing: Two members of our central team completed Creative Commons certificate for educators, contributing to capacity-building efforts within our organsation. The impact of our efforts is clear in how the OEP community at UTS has grown. We made sure that people who used to work alone now work together through partnerships. Keeping OEP going has been hard, but by helping people learn and grow professionally, we brought everyone together, got important people involved, and made UTS a leader in open education.



Included in [Session 6A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Havea, P. H., & Mohanty, M. (2020). Professional development and sustainable development goals. In Quality Education (pp. 654-665). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 60-70. UTS. (n.d.). Sustainable partnerships. In UTS 2027 strategy. Retrieved May 20, 2024, from https://www.uts.edu.au/about/uts-2027-strategy/sustainable-partnerships

Author Keywords
Professional development, Open education advocacy, Partnerships, Institutional strategies

International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE) is the largest global membership organisation for the field of Open, Flexible and Distance Education.

The Technology and Innovation Network (TIN) is an ICDE member-led network of global participants interested in understanding and raising awareness of technology and innovation in education. University of Southern Queensland leads this exciting new initiative with members from all regions of the world.

The key objectives of the network include exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence for learning and teaching innovation on a global scale, and cross-institutional collaboration that leverages educational technologies and digital pedagogies leading to curriculum design that embeds global collaborative learning encompassing intercultural awareness and global competence.

TIN will also incorporate the concept of Glocalisation of learning and collaboration – where participants can learn from and adopt good global practices related to the use of technology-infused learning and teaching.

This session will present why international collaboration is important for innovation and the future of education and use TIN as a case study with examples from the network. Depending on time allocated, there will also be an interactive part of the session that will seek to connect members of the network to the conference.



Included in [Session 7B]: OE Practice in the GLAM sector

Author Keywords
network, international, collaboration, technology, innovation, glocalisation, ICDE, UniSQ

Open educational resources are a well-established model for universities, but high school students often struggle to use these resources effectively. In Taiwan, the updated Curriculum Guidelines require high school students to engage in self-directed learning each semester. This aims to help them explore their academic interests and identities before university. When applying to universities, students’ learning portfolios, which highlight their interests and academic potentials, are crucial for admission. Therefore, universities must provide high-quality open classrooms accessible to high school students. These courses can help students develop academic interests, mindsets, and self-directed learning capabilities.

This approach not only prepares students for future academic success but also promotes a culture of openness, sharing, and collaboration. Leveraging university open classrooms for high school students benefits both the students and the broader educational community. In this presentation, we introduce a case study of establishing an open classroom using a university's general education course, Contemporary Cognitive Neuroscience: Brain and Mind.

By exploring community of inquiry and learning engagement theories, this study establishes a five-step model to transform a large class into a highly interactive online format. By integrating livestreaming technology and platforms like YouTube live streaming, Slido classroom interaction software, and social media such as Facebook and Instagram, the five steps are: immersive live lectures, real-time polling and quick Q&A, filtering crowdsourced questions, extending learning through summaries and reflections, and knowledge sharing on social media. This study employs design-based research with 768 students participating.

Through pre- and post-tests, surveys, platform data, and qualitative research data, the results show:

1. students' academic performance significantly improved, with high school students outperforming university students in the post-test;
2. the new learning model showed significant improvements in students' agentic, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement, as well as critical thinking, with no significant difference in social engagement;
3. nearly 40% of students completed the final project through team collaboration using online tools like Instagram chat, Google Meet, and Google Slides;
4. students initially felt shy and awkward but gradually enjoyed and felt accomplished in knowledge sharing;
5. students used digital note-taking, integrating screenshots, typed notes, and handwriting.

Creating an open classroom for high school students is exciting and rewarding, but it requires significant effort, including human and economic resources. Universities aiming to promote open education should formulate regulations, policies, or funding grants to support teaching teams in creating open classrooms. This project's open large-class interactive teaching method can serve as a reference for universities in promoting open classrooms and conducting highly interactive teaching in the future. Establishing a robust support system can ensure sustainability and continuous improvement in delivering open educational resources to a broader audience. This holistic approach will enhance the learning experience for high school students and contribute to the overall advancement of the educational landscape.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Digital competence, Sustainability, Open Classroom, Learning Engagement, Live-Streaming Technology

Over the past decade, the Taiwan Ministry of Education (MoE) has launched a series of e-learning initiatives to improve educational quality and accessibility. Since 2014, the MoE has funded multiple 3-year projects, each focusing on different aspects of e-learning development.

The inaugural project, initiated in 2014, was a transformative step towards modernizing Taiwanese education. It encouraged educators to overhaul their teaching methods, utilizing digital tools to create high-quality online courses tailored to specific subject areas. This shift towards a more dynamic and interactive learning environment marked a departure from traditional classroom settings, accommodating diverse learning styles.

Following the success of the first project, the MoE launched a second three-year endeavor from 2017 to 2019. This phase aimed to deepen the integration of e-learning into higher education institutions. The focus shifted towards developing interconnected series of courses, enabling universities to offer micro-credit programs. A total of 66 course series were established during this phase, significantly expanding e-learning offerings across Taiwanese universities.

The third phase, starting in 2019, represented a strategic response to the evolving educational landscape, with an emphasis on fostering digital learning readiness. Participating universities were tasked with formulating comprehensive plans to promote e-learning among faculty and students, including the establishment of support teams and incentive structures.

Building on these initiatives, the MoE initiated a second round of funding from 2022 onwards to optimize online learning experiences and extend exemplary courses to neighboring Southeast Asian countries. This involved reconfiguring the project architecture to introduce an alliance-based model for university participation. Each alliance comprised a central hub university with extensive e-learning experience and several partner universities eager to learn from their expertise.

During the initial phase of this four-year project (2022-2023), six alliances involving 32 universities were formed, fostering collaboration within the Taiwanese e-learning ecosystem. As the project progressed, alliances and university compositions were restructured to better align with evolving priorities. By the latter half of the project (2024-2025), five alliances comprising 27 universities were actively engaged in advancing the e-learning agenda.

The current phase of the project focuses on empowering educators, guiding students, and fostering vibrant local ecosystems conducive to educational innovation. This includes developing strategies to incentivize instructional redesign and integrate emerging educational technologies such as AI tutors.

In conclusion, the MoE's e-learning initiatives have made significant strides in promoting online education within Taiwan and beyond. This presentation aims to highlight these achievements and inspire universities to continue developing high-quality online courses, positioning Taiwan as a leading source of e-learning excellence in the region.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

Author Keywords
E-Learning, Project Movement, Alliance-based Model

Today’s higher education (HE) students often need to bridge knowledge and skills gaps for things that are not explicitly covered in their course curriculum. For example, students may need to create a presentation and record it as a video for an assessment, yet they are not taught how to do this. Flexible and timely self-paced options that leverage Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) can help to address gaps such as these but need to cater for specific needs of time-poor students. This presentation outlines early research models and findings into the use of open microlearning, a form of microlearning that is based on the principles of open educational practices (OEP), for self-directed learning at Charles Darwin University. Open microlearning offers quick, bite-sized learning (usually 5-15 minutes) that leverage freely available and reusable materials, as well as collaboration with others, to meet specific learning needs. The research centres on the opportunities and benefits that open microlearning can offer, and models that can be used for design and implementation.

The research is informed by a comprehensive literature review, and data collected from staff and students at Charles Darwin University. The study utilises a Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology that provides an iterative and collaborative approach for designing, testing, and refining interventions in real-world educational settings (McKenney & Reeves, 2013). While microlearning and open practice are not new concepts, research reveals limited familiarity and use within HE contexts. The study highlights key elements for development models with open microlearning, including the importance of micro-assessment and reflection as part of open microlearning interventions.

Open microlearning can assist lecturers and learning designers to develop streamlined and engaging TEL materials for supplementary and extension activities to suit individual student needs in a wide variety of contexts. The focused, micro-format aligns with the trend in adult learner preferences for shorter, more informal educational activities (Bannister et al, 2020) and accommodates busy student schedules.

Open microlearning is a multifaceted construct that requires careful consideration to provide targeted learning to address specific knowledge or skill sets. Properly applied, open microlearning can facilitate effective and efficient learning with reduced cognitive load (Lee, 2021). Inclusion of OEP promotes access and equity in education through the sharing of high-quality resources and reduction of costs (Ossiannilsson, 2020). This study is part of a broader PhD research project around open microlearning as self-directed learning in higher education. In this research open microlearning is not aimed at replacing traditional accredited training, but rather is used for self-directed learning to address knowledge gaps and contribute to improved student success.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

References
Bannister, J., Neve, M., & Kolanko, C. (2020). Increased Educational Reach through a Microlearning Approach: Can Higher Participation Translate to Improved Outcomes? Journal of European CME, 9(1), 1834761-1834761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1834761 Lee, Y.-M. (2021). Mobile microlearning: a systematic literature review and its implications. Interactive learning environments, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1977964 McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing? Educational researcher, 42(2), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463781 Ossiannilsson, E. (2020). Quality models for open, flexible, and online learning. Journal of Computer Science Research.

Author Keywords
Open educational Practice, Microlearning, Self-directed learning, open microlearning

The burgeoning integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT into the fabric of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has highlighted a promising new direction for enhancing automated essay assessment processes. This research delves into the practical implementation of LLMs for evaluating student essays within MOOC frameworks, focusing primarily on exploring advanced prompt engineering strategies.

We investigate a spectrum of methodologies, including few-shot learning, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, and fine-tuning techniques, to discern the most effective strategies for harnessing the capabilities of LLMs in this educational domain. Drawing from the latest advancements in natural language processing (NLP), our study examines the ability of LLMs to deliver accurate, efficient, and scalable assessments of student submissions.

MOOCs typically host hundreds to thousands of students per course, presenting significant logistical challenges regarding assignment evaluation. The volume of essays that require assessment can be overwhelming for instructors, making it virtually impossible to provide detailed, timely feedback without technological assistance. The deployment of LLMs promises not only to enhance the grading efficiency and maintain consistency in evaluation standards across large cohorts.

The primary objective of this study is to explore the application of generative AI (GAI) in assisting with essay grading, utilizing open courses hosted at ewant, the largest MOOCs platform run by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) in Taiwan . This course, "Required Credits for University Students - Emotional Education" is taught by Professor Chen Fei-Chuan at National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. Since its first delivery in 2015, this course has been offered 137 times, with nearly 20,000 students enrolled. From both qualitative and quantitative perspectives, this course represents an optimal choice for the study, offering substantial potential for further research and development. Assignments in this course predominantly involve open-ended questions without standard answers, encouraging students to reflect, discuss, share, and synthesize their personal experiences based on the knowledge acquired during the course. This type of unstructured assignment is better suited for introducing GAI than structured assignments in science and engineering courses with definitive answers.

This research aims to leverage a data-driven approach to develop a GAI system that replicates the grading standards and performance of the instructors or teaching assistants (graders), thereby assisting future educators in efficiently grading large volumes of written assignments. By analyzing the strengths and drawbacks of multiple prompt engineering and fine-tuning methods in automating essay evaluations, the study aims to establish a dataflow pipeline for AI-assisted essay grading, with the expectation of generalizing this process to other courses of a similar nature. Additionally, this research proposes recommendations for designing more effective and scalable automated essay assessment systems tailored for contemporary online education platforms.

Overall, this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential of LLMs in transforming the landscape of essay assessment in MOOCs, thereby contributing valuable insights into the optimization of educational technologies in a GAI era.



Included in [Session 11A]: Artificial Intelligence

References
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877-1901.

Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 22199-22213.

Min, S., Lyu, X., Holtzman, A., Artetxe, M., Lewis, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022). Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837.

Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., ... & Le, Q. V. (2021). Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652.

Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837.

Author Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models, Prompt Engineering, Assessment, MOOCs