OEGlobal 2024

The presentation will discuss an initiative spearheaded by Open Oregon Educational Resources, which received funding to develop openly licensed, equity-focused materials for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) and Sociology courses. The grant-funded project focused on developing materials for high-enrollment courses in disciplines that lead to in-demand occupations where high-quality openly licensed course materials with an equity lens were not currently available. The program began in 2022 and final publication of materials is planned for 2024.

One of the courses identified in this project was Human Services practicum. This presentation will focus on this course from development of the open educational resources, through course curriculum and into instruction. Central to this endeavor was the infusion of an equity lens into every facet of the curriculum. Topics ranging from agency culture to client diversity were explored through this perspective, shedding light on how issues of equity and inclusion impact students interning in human services. The materials not only addressed the diversity of clients but also scrutinized how agencies either support or hinder equity initiatives. Examples of this discussion include analyzing dress codes, provision of culturally-relevant services, and how the agency promotes equity.

Accompanying course packets were designed as open ancillaries, emphasizing equity in learning activities and assignments. Students were challenged to apply an equity lens in their coursework, with assignments structured for clarity and comprehension. Assessments were created using the TILT transparency framework in order to ensure understanding by diverse learners. Furthermore, the curriculum fostered reflective practice and self-care, utilizing journal prompts to encourage contemplation on equity issues and integrating self-care activities to promote habits essential for future human services professionals.

The piloting phase of the course ensured the maintenance of an equity lens in all activities and discussions throughout the term, with ongoing evaluation and feedback shaping the refinement of materials. Ultimately, this initiative underscores a commitment to inclusive education, equipping students with the skills and empathy necessary to navigate diverse professional landscapes and address societal challenges in their future careers.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
Equity, Curriculum development, Openly-licensed materials, Human Services, Inclusion, Diversity, Reflective practice, Self-care, Inclusive education

The COVID-19 pandemic was a pivotal, high impact period in the history of modern education. Seemingly overnight, institutions, programs, and classes around the world moved from being in-person to being online. The amount of individual and collective effort required for this to happen was tremendous. As a result, the pandemic forced both K-12 and post-secondary education systems globally to view the purpose and provision of education, including open education, in different ways. At the same time, the systemic racism against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Colour (BIPOC) was simultaneously being brought to the forefront across all facets of society, including education (Boys, 2022).

It is often assumed that open education, by virtue of improving access to education, de facto supports social justice, but this is not the case (Clinton-Lisell et al., 2023; Iniesto & Bossu, 2023; Lambert, 2018; Mills et al., 2023; Raju et al., 2023). Additionally, online learning is generally thought to improve students’ access to education because of the flexibility in when and where to learn that is possible (Brown, 2012; Butcher & Rose-Adams, 2015; Chen et al., 2022; Kennette & Lin, 2021; Maslowski, 2022; Oguz et al., 2015; Park & Choi, 2009; Pastore & Carr-Chellman, 2009; Williams et al., 2023), but it can, in fact, be a site of social injustice for historically marginalized students (Bakermans et al., 2022; Bozkurt et al., 2020; Croft & Brown, 2020; Ortega et al., 2018; Phirangee & Malec, 2017). As a result, using open pedagogy in an online course to support social justice requires intentionality on the part of the instructor (Bali et al., 2020; Hodgkinson-Williams & Trotter, 2018; Lambert, 2018).

For my dissertation, I am undertaking an exploratory, qualitative, and critical interpretive phenomenological study that seeks to answer this central research question: What are the experiences of faculty members who teach online using open pedagogy to support social justice? My study is situated within the context of one post-secondary institution located in British Columbia, and faculty who teach online courses using open pedagogy to support social justice are being interviewed to better understand how they conceptualize social justice, how they operationalize it using open pedagogy, and what approaches and strategies they use to develop their social justice leadership. In my presentation, I will share preliminary results from my study, and participants will have an opportunity to ask questions, provide feedback, and share ideas.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

References
Bakermans, M., Pfeifer, G., San Martín, W., & LeChasseur, K. (2022). Who writes and who responds? Gender and race-based differences in open annotations. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(5), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2021-0232 Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565 Boys, J. (2022). Exploring inequalities in the social, spatial and material practices of teaching and learning in pandemic times. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00267-z Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D. Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I. Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N. Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083 Brown, J. L. M. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39–42. Butcher, J., & Rose-Adams, J. (2015). Part-time learners in open and distance learning: Revisiting the critical importance of choice, flexibility and employability. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1055719 Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13205 Clinton-Lisell, V.E., Roberts-Crews, J., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). SCOPE of open education: A new framework for research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7356 Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757410 Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the Global South. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.312 Iniesto, F., & Bossu, C. (2023). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open education: A systematic literature review. Distance Education, 44(4), 694-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267472 Kennette, L. N., & Lin, P. S. (2021, December 16). The case for asynchronous online courses: How do students benefit. The Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/E-xcellence-in-Teaching-Blog/12197763 Kishimoto, K. (2018). Anti-racist pedagogy: From faculty's self-reflection to organizing within and beyond the classroom. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 21(4), 540-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248824 Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290 Maslowski, A. K. (2022). Infusing multiculturalism, identity, and social justice in asynchronous courses. Teaching of Psychology, 49(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320964772 Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34 Oguz, F., Chu, C. M., & Chow, A. S. (2015). Studying online: Student motivations and experiences in ALA-accredited LIS programs. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/56/3/4 Ortega, A., Andruczyk, M., & Marquart, M. (2018). Addressing microaggressions and acts of oppression within online classrooms by utilizing principles of transformative learning and liberatory education. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2017.1417945 Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.207 Pastore, R., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009). Motivations for residential students to participate in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 263–277. Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457 Raju, R., Claassen, J., & De Lillie, K. (2023). Social justice: The golden thread in the openness movemen

Open pedagogy offers a transformative approach to education that prioritizes accessibility, inclusivity, and active engagement, fostering both epistemic and social justice. This presentation explores the application of open pedagogy to mitigate educational inequalities, addressing critical questions around the construction of equitable learning activities, design choices that enhance epistemic virtue, and the implementation of social justice interventions in learner-centric environments.

Constructing Activities to Mitigate Epistemic Vices

Epistemic vices undermine the learning process and perpetuate educational inequities. This section examines strategies for designing activities that actively counter these vices. By integrating collaborative projects, peer review, and reflective practices, educators can create a learning environment that values diverse perspectives and encourages critical thinking. Activities such as co-created content, and community-based learning projects are highlighted as effective tools for fostering open-mindedness and intellectual humility. These approaches not only mitigate epistemic vices but also promote a culture of continuous inquiry and mutual respect among learners.

Enhancing Epistemic Virtue through Design Choices

Epistemic virtues, including curiosity, intellectual courage, and open-mindedness, are essential for a just and equitable educational environment. This section explores how thoughtful design choices in open pedagogy can enhance these virtues. For instance, the use of open educational resources (OER) allows students to engage with a variety of materials and viewpoints, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Incorporating problem-based learning and inquiry-driven projects can stimulate intellectual curiosity and encourage students to take intellectual risks. The presentation also discusses the role of scaffolding and culturally responsive assessment practices in supporting the development of these virtues, ensuring that all learners, regardless of their background, have the opportunity to thrive academically.

Social Justice Interventions in a Learner-Centric Environment

Open pedagogy inherently supports social justice by prioritizing the needs and voices of learners. This section outlines practical interventions that can be implemented to promote social justice in educational settings. By adopting inclusive teaching practices, such as culturally responsive pedagogy and universal design for learning (UDL), educators can create environments that acknowledge and value the diverse experiences of all students. The presentation highlights case studies of successful social justice interventions, such as participatory action research projects and service-learning initiatives, that empower students to engage with and address real-world social issues. These interventions not only enhance learning outcomes but also foster a sense of agency and social responsibility among students.

The integration of open pedagogy in educational practice holds significant potential for advancing epistemic and social justice. By learning from activities that mitigate epistemic vices, making intentional design choices to enhance epistemic virtues, and implementing targeted social justice interventions, educators can create equitable and inclusive learning environments. This presentation aims to provide educators with practical strategies and insights to leverage open pedagogy in the pursuit of educational equity, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to succeed and contribute to a just society.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
Social Justice, Epistemic Justice, Learner-Centric, Universal Design for Learning, Open Pedagogy

In keeping with the theme of “Open is Everyone’s Business”, Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU) will share a comprehensive, nuts-and-bolts look into its Zero Textbook Cost (ZTC) Initiative and the collaboration required from various departments across the university in order to ensure ZTC courses are identified and marked during course registration. In the ZTC Initiative, KPU Open partners with the Library, the Registrar’s Office, Faculties and Departments, the Office of Planning and Accountability, and with individual instructors.

In Spring 2018, KPU embarked on a groundbreaking mission: to eliminate textbook costs for students. With support from BCcampus, KPU pioneered Canada's first ZTC Initiative, introducing 75 ZTC sections and a flexible 1-year Certificate in Arts credential. Since then, the initiative has flourished, transforming the educational landscape. Now, just six years later, KPU offers an impressive average of 22% course section offerings with ZTC, along with eight known ZTC credentials, including two four-year Baccalaureate degrees. As ZTC has grown, so have the needs to support the initiative, needs which required reaching out to other departments.

This presentation will give participants a practical and concrete look into how we manage the various parts of the ZTC program daily. As the program continues to grow, we continually examine our process to see how to improve and simplify as much as possible. We will for example discuss how students are made aware of the existence of ZTC courses, such as through the ZTC marker in Banner, as well as through our Student Ambassador Pilot and a social media campaign in collaboration with the Kwantlen Student Association.

We will also show how we collect data on ZTC courses; a new and improved process that involves collaboration with the Registrar’s Office, Deans, and the Office of Planning and Accountability.

We continually strive to grow the number of ZTC courses and programs. In order to ensure the availability of ZTC options for students in all areas of study, we have adjusted our grant structure to specifically target courses lacking in ZTC options. In addition, the Library and liaison librarians support ZTC classes in several ways, for example with a scanning service, assistance in finding relevant open materials, providing library materials with unlimited simultaneous users, as well as added options to improve accessibility of materials.

Lastly, we will provide a glimpse into our future plans, such as the creation of a Low Textbook Cost marker in addition to ZTC, how to future increase student awareness of both those programs, and our search for a new method for tracking OER Adoptions across KPU.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
zero textbook cost program, open education policies and strategies, sustainability