OEGlobal 2024

In this keynote, I explore socio-personal histories of open higher education in conversation with commitments to facilitate social justice transformation. More specifically I consider the role of higher education in being-and-doing ‘open’ and how this relates to struggles over the right to knowledge, knowing and learning. A line of questioning I pursue is: what are the implications of different articulations of open-ness for the capacity of higher education to contribute to social justice transformation – and what constitutes, limits and enables this? Considering the possibilities for higher education to open up time, space and resources for equitable participation in transformative processes, I argue it is time for social justice praxis, drawing on my new book with Dr Matt Lumb. My overarching aim is to utilise the keynote for collective questioning of the possibilities for open-ing education for social justice transformation.

Open educational resources are a well-established model for universities, but high school students often struggle to use these resources effectively. In Taiwan, the updated Curriculum Guidelines require high school students to engage in self-directed learning each semester. This aims to help them explore their academic interests and identities before university. When applying to universities, students’ learning portfolios, which highlight their interests and academic potentials, are crucial for admission. Therefore, universities must provide high-quality open classrooms accessible to high school students. These courses can help students develop academic interests, mindsets, and self-directed learning capabilities.

This approach not only prepares students for future academic success but also promotes a culture of openness, sharing, and collaboration. Leveraging university open classrooms for high school students benefits both the students and the broader educational community. In this presentation, we introduce a case study of establishing an open classroom using a university's general education course, Contemporary Cognitive Neuroscience: Brain and Mind.

By exploring community of inquiry and learning engagement theories, this study establishes a five-step model to transform a large class into a highly interactive online format. By integrating livestreaming technology and platforms like YouTube live streaming, Slido classroom interaction software, and social media such as Facebook and Instagram, the five steps are: immersive live lectures, real-time polling and quick Q&A, filtering crowdsourced questions, extending learning through summaries and reflections, and knowledge sharing on social media. This study employs design-based research with 768 students participating.

Through pre- and post-tests, surveys, platform data, and qualitative research data, the results show:

1. students' academic performance significantly improved, with high school students outperforming university students in the post-test;
2. the new learning model showed significant improvements in students' agentic, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement, as well as critical thinking, with no significant difference in social engagement;
3. nearly 40% of students completed the final project through team collaboration using online tools like Instagram chat, Google Meet, and Google Slides;
4. students initially felt shy and awkward but gradually enjoyed and felt accomplished in knowledge sharing;
5. students used digital note-taking, integrating screenshots, typed notes, and handwriting.

Creating an open classroom for high school students is exciting and rewarding, but it requires significant effort, including human and economic resources. Universities aiming to promote open education should formulate regulations, policies, or funding grants to support teaching teams in creating open classrooms. This project's open large-class interactive teaching method can serve as a reference for universities in promoting open classrooms and conducting highly interactive teaching in the future. Establishing a robust support system can ensure sustainability and continuous improvement in delivering open educational resources to a broader audience. This holistic approach will enhance the learning experience for high school students and contribute to the overall advancement of the educational landscape.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Digital competence, Sustainability, Open Classroom, Learning Engagement, Live-Streaming Technology

What happens when a long-standing commitment to open sharing of knowledge awakens to and begins to infuse responses to the stark reality of the climate emergency? What new learning practices are catalyzed, and how can this lead to a more just and livable world?

In this session, we’ll explore some ways that more timely, equitable and effective climate learning is being enabled by the methods and materials of open education; and also how open education practices can evolve to maximize the positive impacts of climate action efforts.

Substantial progress has been made on climate action and climate justice in recent years. But our “business as usual” trajectory of incremental change within existing systems still has us on track for warming of over 3C by 2100. This trajectory is less dire than the prospects of 4C+ that we faced a decade ago; but without much deeper transformations, we’re still on a path to trigger planetary tipping points, ecosystem collapses and mass disruptions of human society.

More must be done. And as a means of transformation, open practices have a key role to play.

These questions are playing out now in developing the Climate Project at MIT, an ambitious program announced in early 2024 to do bigger things faster and work more effectively with partners around the scientific and societal challenges of climate change.

In this session, we’ll highlight some of the ways that open knowledge practices are infusing climate work at MIT and in its collaborations, and ask what might be possible if a commitment to open knowledge practices spreads widely across climate action spaces.

At OE Global 2023, a workshop session began to consider an open climate knowledge community of practice. We discussed needs and opportunities, and identified some resources and programs that can serve as inspirations and a basis for future work. See workshop notes at https://bit.ly/oeglobal-climate-community.

One year later, where are we? How are open methods and materials making a difference for general public engagement and empowering k-12, post-secondary, workforce and professional learning about climate change and climate justice? Current and future generations are counting on us to make this everyone’s business.


Included in [Session 10A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Notes from OE Global’23 workshop on open climate knowledge: Accelerating Climate Action and Climate Justice Through Open Education.
OE Week 2024 event: Accelerating Climate Action and Climate Justice Through Open Education.
International Open Access Week 2022 webinar video: Learn Climate with Open MIT Resources.

Author Keywords
Lifelong and informal learning, Open educational practices, Open education policies and strategies, Social justice, Sustainability

The presentation will discuss an initiative spearheaded by Open Oregon Educational Resources, which received funding to develop openly licensed, equity-focused materials for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) and Sociology courses. The grant-funded project focused on developing materials for high-enrollment courses in disciplines that lead to in-demand occupations where high-quality openly licensed course materials with an equity lens were not currently available. The program began in 2022 and final publication of materials is planned for 2024.

One of the courses identified in this project was Human Services practicum. This presentation will focus on this course from development of the open educational resources, through course curriculum and into instruction. Central to this endeavor was the infusion of an equity lens into every facet of the curriculum. Topics ranging from agency culture to client diversity were explored through this perspective, shedding light on how issues of equity and inclusion impact students interning in human services. The materials not only addressed the diversity of clients but also scrutinized how agencies either support or hinder equity initiatives. Examples of this discussion include analyzing dress codes, provision of culturally-relevant services, and how the agency promotes equity.

Accompanying course packets were designed as open ancillaries, emphasizing equity in learning activities and assignments. Students were challenged to apply an equity lens in their coursework, with assignments structured for clarity and comprehension. Assessments were created using the TILT transparency framework in order to ensure understanding by diverse learners. Furthermore, the curriculum fostered reflective practice and self-care, utilizing journal prompts to encourage contemplation on equity issues and integrating self-care activities to promote habits essential for future human services professionals.

The piloting phase of the course ensured the maintenance of an equity lens in all activities and discussions throughout the term, with ongoing evaluation and feedback shaping the refinement of materials. Ultimately, this initiative underscores a commitment to inclusive education, equipping students with the skills and empathy necessary to navigate diverse professional landscapes and address societal challenges in their future careers.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
Equity, Curriculum development, Openly-licensed materials, Human Services, Inclusion, Diversity, Reflective practice, Self-care, Inclusive education

This presentation introduces Sylla, a platform solution designed to enable the large-scale adoption of OER at teaching institutions. Sylla's platform provides librarians and faculty with personalised OER recommendations tailored to their course syllabi. It provides institutional staff with a tool to analyse and collaborate on any of their courses & reading lists with sufficient OER potential. At the same time, it offers both librarians and individual faculty a way to streamline the discovery and adoption of OER for their course(s) - saving them time in the process.

The session will include a brief demonstration of the Sylla solution, results from recent Sylla pilots, including a case study at Coventry University in the UK, where we enabled savings of 100,000 EUR and increased OER integration within the School of Business and Law. Additionally, we'll be sharing more about our engagements and the first upcoming pilots in Australia & New Zealand. By addressing key barriers and providing strategic insights around OER, Sylla empowers institutions and faculty to advance open education and create more accessible, equitable learning environments.

One of the biggest challenges in getting some faculty members to adopt OER is a lack of supplemental resources. In some disciplines, this can be the difference between using a resource that students struggle to pay for and resources that are free. Artificial Intelligence can help solve this challenge as AI tools create flashcards, quizzes, graphics and even course objectives and key takeaways to pair with OER textbooks and additional materials.

This session will look at the AI tools and best practices that Open Educational textbook authors can use to help create supplemental materials for their textbooks quickly and easily. We will use and explain resources for faculty members and others who want to adopt or use Open Educational Resources, but they miss the ease of publisher provided flashcards, notes, presentations, quizzes and tests.



Included in [Session 10D]: Open Texts (Workshops)

Author Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Supplemental Materials, Open Education Publishing, Open Textbooks

Over the past decade, the Taiwan Ministry of Education (MoE) has launched a series of e-learning initiatives to improve educational quality and accessibility. Since 2014, the MoE has funded multiple 3-year projects, each focusing on different aspects of e-learning development.

The inaugural project, initiated in 2014, was a transformative step towards modernizing Taiwanese education. It encouraged educators to overhaul their teaching methods, utilizing digital tools to create high-quality online courses tailored to specific subject areas. This shift towards a more dynamic and interactive learning environment marked a departure from traditional classroom settings, accommodating diverse learning styles.

Following the success of the first project, the MoE launched a second three-year endeavor from 2017 to 2019. This phase aimed to deepen the integration of e-learning into higher education institutions. The focus shifted towards developing interconnected series of courses, enabling universities to offer micro-credit programs. A total of 66 course series were established during this phase, significantly expanding e-learning offerings across Taiwanese universities.

The third phase, starting in 2019, represented a strategic response to the evolving educational landscape, with an emphasis on fostering digital learning readiness. Participating universities were tasked with formulating comprehensive plans to promote e-learning among faculty and students, including the establishment of support teams and incentive structures.

Building on these initiatives, the MoE initiated a second round of funding from 2022 onwards to optimize online learning experiences and extend exemplary courses to neighboring Southeast Asian countries. This involved reconfiguring the project architecture to introduce an alliance-based model for university participation. Each alliance comprised a central hub university with extensive e-learning experience and several partner universities eager to learn from their expertise.

During the initial phase of this four-year project (2022-2023), six alliances involving 32 universities were formed, fostering collaboration within the Taiwanese e-learning ecosystem. As the project progressed, alliances and university compositions were restructured to better align with evolving priorities. By the latter half of the project (2024-2025), five alliances comprising 27 universities were actively engaged in advancing the e-learning agenda.

The current phase of the project focuses on empowering educators, guiding students, and fostering vibrant local ecosystems conducive to educational innovation. This includes developing strategies to incentivize instructional redesign and integrate emerging educational technologies such as AI tutors.

In conclusion, the MoE's e-learning initiatives have made significant strides in promoting online education within Taiwan and beyond. This presentation aims to highlight these achievements and inspire universities to continue developing high-quality online courses, positioning Taiwan as a leading source of e-learning excellence in the region.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

Author Keywords
E-Learning, Project Movement, Alliance-based Model

Open Educational Resources (OER) have been discussed in Sweden as early as 2008 (Westman & Paulsson). Unfortunately, their adoption is still very limited due to a lack of understanding about their nature, how they can be used, and the opportunities they present (National Library of Sweden, 2022). In light of the UNESCO recommendation on OERs, the National Library of Sweden was tasked with developing national guidelines for open science by the Swedish Government. These were recently presented and include the use of OER (National Library of Sweden, 2024).

The national library's work on national guidelines was companied by The Association of Swedish Higher Education Institutions (SUHF) working group on OERs. SUHFs aim is to promote the sector interests to external actors and at strengthening internal cooperation. The task of the working group is to develop proposals for recommendations on what national OER coordination could look like and how educational institutions could create a long-term structure for the work. The OER working group reports first and foremost to the working group on open science, which put forward a roadmap for open science as early as 2021.

In line with the national recommendations for open science, SUHF updated their roadmap in the beginning of the year (SUHF, 2024) and includes now a section about OERs. The roadmap defines the responsibility of Swedish Higher Education institution to "actively work towards creating a sharing culture regarding educational resources by encouraging and promoting the creation, sharing, and use of open educational resources". In this presentation, a member of the OER working group presents the roadmap and its' accompanying guideline for the OER section, which tries to ensure that OERs are finally everybody's business in the Swedish Higher Education system.



Included in [Session 10A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Moore, M. G. (2022). From correspondence education to online distance education. In Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1-16). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

National Library of Sweden (2022). Öppna lärresurser – en kartläggning och analys: Redovisning av uppdraget om öppna lärresurser, U2021/04163. Available at: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kb:publ-691

National Library of Sweden (2024). Natio­nal guide­li­nes for promoting open science in Sweden. Available at: https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kb:publ-722.

SUHF (2024). Färdplan för öppen vetenskap (reviderad). Available at: https://suhf.se/app/uploads/2024/02/REK-2021-1-Fardplan-for-oppen-vetenskap-SUHF-Antagen-av-SUHFs-presidium-REVIDERAD-240201-1.pdf.

Westman, P., & Paulsson, J. (2008). Open Educational Resources in Swedish Higher Education. ScieCom Info, 4(23).

Author Keywords
Open Educational Resources, National policies, Sweden, UNESCO recommendation on OER, Higher Education

Learning design is the development and creation of learning and teaching experiences based on pedagogical theory and practice. This process might include resource generation, collaboration and sharing between colleagues and the use of participatory technologies (Conole, 2015). It requires learning designers (LDs) to act as well as performing as change agents in higher educational institutions (Bond, Lockee & Blevins, 2023). These attributes are also central to Open Educational Practices (OEP) (Hegarty, 2015), suggesting that effective learning design could be invaluable in advancing Open Education movement. Discussions about learning design often overlook the identity of the LD (Heggart, 2021).

In their position at the nexus of subject areas, institutional priorities and student experience, LDs have been characterised as the connectors between different fields of knowledge and working practices (Roberts, et al., 2023) and problem solvers and change agents (Pollard & Kumar, 2022). OEP and open pedagogy hold the promise of advancing ethical and inclusive education, fostering learner equity. LDs are positioned strategically to facilitate the realisation of making OEP everyone’s business for higher educational institutions. However, this position between fields of knowledge, sometimes labelled the ‘third space’, can put LDs on the margins of education. Their role as change agents can seem peripheral or is not a priority in advancing OEP for their institution.

In a study of LDs and OEP in education institutions, Morgan (2019) found that LDs consider themselves advocates of open education and seek out opportunities to engage in OEP. However, the LDs in the study experienced restrictions on this advocacy; limitations included lack of time, space, and support from leadership. There was a disparity between the intentional and operational agency of the LDs. In the Australian context, there has been little exploration of this relationship between LDs and OEP.

In this presentation, we report on preliminary findings from an initial literature review aimed at understanding the role of LDs in advocating for OEP. Early insights, combined with reflections on our practice, indicate that while libraries and librarians often take the lead in discussions about OER, LDs are not as engaged when the conversation shifts to learning and teaching. Initial feedback from stakeholders highlights the importance of cross-pollination between LDs and other teams, including librarians, faculties and senior management. We believe that everyone has a specific role to play in advancing OEP.

Our focus will be on the core practices of learning design, emphasising that catering to the student learning journey through the constructive alignment of the curriculum is fundamental to effective learning design and central to OEP. UN Sustainable Development Goal 16 calls for effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. By cultivating an understanding of LD agency in OEP, higher education institutions, and all institutions that employ LDs, can ensure their strategy includes the professional development and capacity building needed to move LDs from the periphery to the centre of OEP advocacy.

Presentation resources
Padlet discussion: https://padlet.com/postgraduate_futures/OEGlobal2024
Blog post by Mais Fatayer: How can learning designers unlock doors to Open Educational Practices? - LX at UTS
Keith Heggart and Mais Fatayer's open textbook: Designing Learning Experiences for Inclusivity and Diversity: Advice for Learning Designers – Simple Book Publishing.

Included in [Session 10B]: Digital Capability

References
Bond, A., Lockee, B., & Blevins, S. (2023, October 31). Instructional Designers as Institutional Change Agents. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2023/10/instructional-designers-as-institutional-change-agents

Conole, G. (2015). The 7Cs of learning design. In J. Dalziel (Ed.), Learning Design: Conceptualizing a framework for teaching and learning online (pp. 117-145). Routledge.

Heggart, K. (2021). Formulated Professional Identity of Learning Designers and the Role of Open Education in Maintaining that Identity. In A. Marcus-Quinn & T. Hourigan (Eds.), Handbook for online learning contexts: Digital, mobile and open: policy and practice (pp. 21-34). Springer International Publishing AG.

Morgan, T. (2019). Instructional Designers and Open Education Practices: Negotiating the Gap Between Intentional and Operational Agency. Open Praxis, 11(4), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1011

Pollard, R. & Kumar, S. (2022). Instructional Designers in Higher Education: Roles, Challenges, and Supports. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 11(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.59668/354.5896

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Learning design, Agency

The COVID-19 pandemic was a pivotal, high impact period in the history of modern education. Seemingly overnight, institutions, programs, and classes around the world moved from being in-person to being online. The amount of individual and collective effort required for this to happen was tremendous. As a result, the pandemic forced both K-12 and post-secondary education systems globally to view the purpose and provision of education, including open education, in different ways. At the same time, the systemic racism against Black, Indigenous, and other People of Colour (BIPOC) was simultaneously being brought to the forefront across all facets of society, including education (Boys, 2022).

It is often assumed that open education, by virtue of improving access to education, de facto supports social justice, but this is not the case (Clinton-Lisell et al., 2023; Iniesto & Bossu, 2023; Lambert, 2018; Mills et al., 2023; Raju et al., 2023). Additionally, online learning is generally thought to improve students’ access to education because of the flexibility in when and where to learn that is possible (Brown, 2012; Butcher & Rose-Adams, 2015; Chen et al., 2022; Kennette & Lin, 2021; Maslowski, 2022; Oguz et al., 2015; Park & Choi, 2009; Pastore & Carr-Chellman, 2009; Williams et al., 2023), but it can, in fact, be a site of social injustice for historically marginalized students (Bakermans et al., 2022; Bozkurt et al., 2020; Croft & Brown, 2020; Ortega et al., 2018; Phirangee & Malec, 2017). As a result, using open pedagogy in an online course to support social justice requires intentionality on the part of the instructor (Bali et al., 2020; Hodgkinson-Williams & Trotter, 2018; Lambert, 2018).

For my dissertation, I am undertaking an exploratory, qualitative, and critical interpretive phenomenological study that seeks to answer this central research question: What are the experiences of faculty members who teach online using open pedagogy to support social justice? My study is situated within the context of one post-secondary institution located in British Columbia, and faculty who teach online courses using open pedagogy to support social justice are being interviewed to better understand how they conceptualize social justice, how they operationalize it using open pedagogy, and what approaches and strategies they use to develop their social justice leadership. In my presentation, I will share preliminary results from my study, and participants will have an opportunity to ask questions, provide feedback, and share ideas.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

References
Bakermans, M., Pfeifer, G., San Martín, W., & LeChasseur, K. (2022). Who writes and who responds? Gender and race-based differences in open annotations. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(5), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-12-2021-0232

Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565 Boys, J. (2022). Exploring inequalities in the social, spatial and material practices of teaching and learning in pandemic times. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00267-z

Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D. Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I. Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Bond, M., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N. Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Brown, J. L. M. (2012). Online learning: A comparison of web-based and land-based courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39–42.

Butcher, J., & Rose-Adams, J. (2015). Part-time learners in open and distance learning: Revisiting the critical importance of choice, flexibility and employability. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1055719

Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13205

Clinton-Lisell, V.E., Roberts-Crews, J., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). SCOPE of open education: A new framework for research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(4), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7356

Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757410

Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the Global South. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.312

Iniesto, F., & Bossu, C. (2023). Equity, diversity, and inclusion in open education: A systematic literature review. Distance Education, 44(4), 694-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267472

Kennette, L. N., & Lin, P. S. (2021, December 16). The case for asynchronous online courses: How do students benefit. The Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/E-xcellence-in-Teaching-Blog/12197763

Kishimoto, K. (2018). Anti-racist pedagogy: From faculty's self-reflection to organizing within and beyond the classroom. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 21(4), 540-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2016.1248824

Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290 Maslowski, A. K. (2022). Infusing multiculturalism, identity, and social justice in asynchronous courses. Teaching of Psychology, 49(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320964772

Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34

Oguz, F., Chu, C. M., & Chow, A. S. (2015). Studying online: Student motivations and experiences in ALA-accredited LIS programs. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/56/3/4

Ortega, A., Andruczyk, M., & Marquart, M. (2018). Addressing microaggressions and acts of oppression within online classrooms by utilizing principles of transformative learning and liberatory education. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 27(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2017.1417945

Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.207

Pastore, R., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009). Motivations for residential students to participate in online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 263–277.

Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, ide

Today’s higher education (HE) students often need to bridge knowledge and skills gaps for things that are not explicitly covered in their course curriculum. For example, students may need to create a presentation and record it as a video for an assessment, yet they are not taught how to do this. Flexible and timely self-paced options that leverage Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) can help to address gaps such as these but need to cater for specific needs of time-poor students. This presentation outlines early research models and findings into the use of open microlearning, a form of microlearning that is based on the principles of open educational practices (OEP), for self-directed learning at Charles Darwin University. Open microlearning offers quick, bite-sized learning (usually 5-15 minutes) that leverage freely available and reusable materials, as well as collaboration with others, to meet specific learning needs. The research centres on the opportunities and benefits that open microlearning can offer, and models that can be used for design and implementation.

The research is informed by a comprehensive literature review, and data collected from staff and students at Charles Darwin University. The study utilises a Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology that provides an iterative and collaborative approach for designing, testing, and refining interventions in real-world educational settings (McKenney & Reeves, 2013). While microlearning and open practice are not new concepts, research reveals limited familiarity and use within HE contexts. The study highlights key elements for development models with open microlearning, including the importance of micro-assessment and reflection as part of open microlearning interventions.

Open microlearning can assist lecturers and learning designers to develop streamlined and engaging TEL materials for supplementary and extension activities to suit individual student needs in a wide variety of contexts. The focused, micro-format aligns with the trend in adult learner preferences for shorter, more informal educational activities (Bannister et al, 2020) and accommodates busy student schedules.

Open microlearning is a multifaceted construct that requires careful consideration to provide targeted learning to address specific knowledge or skill sets. Properly applied, open microlearning can facilitate effective and efficient learning with reduced cognitive load (Lee, 2021). Inclusion of OEP promotes access and equity in education through the sharing of high-quality resources and reduction of costs (Ossiannilsson, 2020). This study is part of a broader PhD research project around open microlearning as self-directed learning in higher education. In this research open microlearning is not aimed at replacing traditional accredited training, but rather is used for self-directed learning to address knowledge gaps and contribute to improved student success.



Included in [Session 10C]: Practice in OE

References
Bannister, J., Neve, M., & Kolanko, C. (2020). Increased Educational Reach through a Microlearning Approach: Can Higher Participation Translate to Improved Outcomes? Journal of European CME, 9(1), 1834761-1834761. https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2020.1834761

Lee, Y.-M. (2021). Mobile microlearning: a systematic literature review and its implications. Interactive learning environments, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1977964

McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing? Educational researcher, 42(2), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463781

Ossiannilsson, E. (2020). Quality models for open, flexible, and online learning. Journal of Computer Science Research.

Author Keywords
Open educational Practice, Microlearning, Self-directed learning, open microlearning

Open pedagogy offers a transformative approach to education that prioritizes accessibility, inclusivity, and active engagement, fostering both epistemic and social justice. This presentation explores the application of open pedagogy to mitigate educational inequalities, addressing critical questions around the construction of equitable learning activities, design choices that enhance epistemic virtue, and the implementation of social justice interventions in learner-centric environments.

Constructing Activities to Mitigate Epistemic Vices

Epistemic vices undermine the learning process and perpetuate educational inequities. This section examines strategies for designing activities that actively counter these vices. By integrating collaborative projects, peer review, and reflective practices, educators can create a learning environment that values diverse perspectives and encourages critical thinking. Activities such as co-created content, and community-based learning projects are highlighted as effective tools for fostering open-mindedness and intellectual humility. These approaches not only mitigate epistemic vices but also promote a culture of continuous inquiry and mutual respect among learners.

Enhancing Epistemic Virtue through Design Choices

Epistemic virtues, including curiosity, intellectual courage, and open-mindedness, are essential for a just and equitable educational environment. This section explores how thoughtful design choices in open pedagogy can enhance these virtues. For instance, the use of open educational resources (OER) allows students to engage with a variety of materials and viewpoints, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. Incorporating problem-based learning and inquiry-driven projects can stimulate intellectual curiosity and encourage students to take intellectual risks. The presentation also discusses the role of scaffolding and culturally responsive assessment practices in supporting the development of these virtues, ensuring that all learners, regardless of their background, have the opportunity to thrive academically.

Social Justice Interventions in a Learner-Centric Environment

Open pedagogy inherently supports social justice by prioritizing the needs and voices of learners. This section outlines practical interventions that can be implemented to promote social justice in educational settings. By adopting inclusive teaching practices, such as culturally responsive pedagogy and universal design for learning (UDL), educators can create environments that acknowledge and value the diverse experiences of all students. The presentation highlights case studies of successful social justice interventions, such as participatory action research projects and service-learning initiatives, that empower students to engage with and address real-world social issues. These interventions not only enhance learning outcomes but also foster a sense of agency and social responsibility among students.

The integration of open pedagogy in educational practice holds significant potential for advancing epistemic and social justice. By learning from activities that mitigate epistemic vices, making intentional design choices to enhance epistemic virtues, and implementing targeted social justice interventions, educators can create equitable and inclusive learning environments. This presentation aims to provide educators with practical strategies and insights to leverage open pedagogy in the pursuit of educational equity, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to succeed and contribute to a just society.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
Social Justice, Epistemic Justice, Learner-Centric, Universal Design for Learning, Open Pedagogy

The Global OER Graduate Network (GO-GN) [1] is an international network of doctoral researchers and alumni who work in the field of open education. The network currently has 179 doctoral researcher and alumni members, an increase of 54% since 2020. Our members’ institutions are based in 28 different countries around the world and approximately 30% of our membership is based in the Global South. The GO-GN network also includes a wider community of several hundred experts, supervisors, mentors and other interested parties who connect to form a community of practice. Open is GO-GN's business!

GO-GN supports and connects our members, raises the profile of member research and actively promotes and explores openness as a form and function of research. Central to our mission are equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI). We achieve these aims in a range of ways, including holding regular online events (such as member research specials, guest speaker events and edit-a-thons), face-to-face workshops, collaborative publication opportunities (e.g. our Open Research Handbook) [2] sprints (e.g. on OEP and AIED) and 1:2:1 sessions. This increased diversity of our offer reflects both our response to the Covid-19 pandemic and our community of care approach [3].

Hosting events to support and connect our doctoral researchers prior to major international open educational conferences are a priority for GO-GN. Last year we celebrated our 10th anniversary in Edmonton, Canada prior to the Open Education Global 2023 conference [4]. Prior to OE Global 2024 we will be holding a two-day symposium and workshop to enable networking, the sharing of research and collaboration. Our symposium on day one will comprise networking and research sharing activities. The focus of day two’s workshop, which will be open for participation from the wider open education community, will be to progress our EDI work, particularly in the Asia and Pacific regions.

We are proposing a presentation session at OE Global 2024 to showcase and amplify the voices and research of our doctoral researcher and alumni members who will be participating in our workshop and this year’s OE Global conference. This session will facilitate and support networking through the sharing of research between GO-GN and the wider OE Global community. The presentation will begin with a very brief overview of GO-GN, followed by a series of short interactive lightening talks from GO-GN members on their research. These lightening talks will provide insights into the diversity of current doctoral research into open education. There will be plenty of opportunity for questions, interaction and feedback in this fast-paced session!



Included in [Session 10B]: Digital Capability

References
[1] http://go-gn.net
[2] https://go-gn.net/gogn_outputs/open-research-handbook/
[3] e.g. Weller, M. (21 July 2020) GO-GN community in a time of crisis (https://blog.edtechie.net/go-gn/go-gn-community-in-a-time-of-crisis/) and Weller, M., Farrow, R., Pitt, R. & Iniesto, P. (2021) Care and Community in the GO-GN network. OERXDomains 2021 Conference (https://open.library.okstate.edu/oerxdomain2021guide/chapter/care-community-in-the-go-gn-network/)
[4] https://go-gn.net/category/10th-anniversary-workshop/

Author Keywords
Open Research, Open Educational Practices, Open Education, Doctoral Research, Community of Practice, Community of Care, Co-creation, Collaboration, Equity Diversity and Inclusion

In 2021 California made the largest public investment in history in OER and Zero Textbook Cost degrees with a $115M grant program. Beginning in 2022, all California Community Colleges received funds to develop and implement ZTC pathways. As of 2024, colleges are developing hundreds of ZTC pathways to transform the student experience in the United States’ largest system of higher education, serving 2M+ students.

In this session, hear from leaders who are coordinating and supporting colleges in this historic work. What supports are provided to colleges? How are diversity, equity, and inclusion woven into support for colleges? What role do Open Pedagogy and Generative AI play? What is the sustainability plan for this massive undertaking? We will also consider how California got here and what it will mean when all colleges offer ZTC pathways.

The unique audience of OEGlobal presents an opportunity to consider how the ZTC movement in California can impact higher education in general. 



Included in [Session 10A]: Practice and Policy in OE

Author Keywords
Zero Textbook Cost degrees, Open Education policies and strategies, Community colleges

When we started setting up a portal for Open Educational Resources at universities in Lower Saxony in 2019, now known as twillo.de, we were not the first in Germany to embark on such a project. At the same time, state-wide repositories in the higher education sector were also set up and disseminated in other federal states. A centralised platform could have saved resources here, but the approach of distributed repositories offers greater potential for innovation through the possibility of testing different approaches and lightweight further development. It was clear from the outset that the repositories still needed to be merged so that teachers and students would not end up having to search numerous sources in parallel. For this reason, we started building a central OER search index for distributed and heterogeneous OER repositories in 2020, which has since then been publicly available at oersi.org.

As it turned out that searching through a much larger amount of materials in OERSI was much more convenient and performant than searching in our own repository itself, we decided to develop a plugin for WordPress with which we could integrate the search functionality of OERSI into the twillo homepage. OERSI offers the option of submitting queries via an open API and receiving the metadata. This solution has shown that the approach of integrating the search into websites is also becoming increasingly interesting for other providers of OER platforms as well, as the configurability of the plugin also allows specific parts of materials to be preselected. For example, a university of education can limit itself to the subjects of the teacher training programme, a technical university to the selection of engineering and natural sciences subjects or to the restriction of regional offerings or selected languages. Compared to other metasearch engines, this approach offers the possibility of making cross-regional, multilingual and international content available on your own website.

Due to the open design of this overall architecture as an open service and with open source components in combination with compact tutorials on the use and integration of GitHub and GitLab for the provision of OER, complete solutions can be implemented in the shortest possible time using simple means, even for smaller institutions without a large infrastructure, with minimum costs and maximum results. The overall system offers a pragmatic approach to an infrastructure for finding and publishing Open Educational Resources that is already available worldwide today.

Now that the success of this overall approach has been demonstrated in the context of Open Educational Resources, we are currently working on a possible subsequent use of the components for other areas of Open Science, e.g. to make open data or course information from university alliances from distributed sources findable in the same way and, in the case of data, to point out an easy way for sharing and collaboration.



Included in [Session 10B]: Digital Capability

References
OERSI https://oersi.org/
twillo https://www.twillo.de/
Plugin https://gitlab.com/TIBHannover/oer/wordpress-oersi-plugin
Tutorials https://oersi.org/resources?search=%22github+oer+tutorial%22
Metadata Form https://oersi.gitlab.io/metadata-form/metadata-generator.html

Author Keywords
Distributed Repositories, Search Index, WordPress Integration, Tutorials, OERSI

In keeping with the theme of “Open is Everyone’s Business”, Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU) will share a comprehensive, nuts-and-bolts look into its Zero Textbook Cost (ZTC) Initiative and the collaboration required from various departments across the university in order to ensure ZTC courses are identified and marked during course registration. In the ZTC Initiative, KPU Open partners with the Library, the Registrar’s Office, Faculties and Departments, the Office of Planning and Accountability, and with individual instructors.

In Spring 2018, KPU embarked on a groundbreaking mission: to eliminate textbook costs for students. With support from BCcampus, KPU pioneered Canada's first ZTC Initiative, introducing 75 ZTC sections and a flexible 1-year Certificate in Arts credential. Since then, the initiative has flourished, transforming the educational landscape. Now, just six years later, KPU offers an impressive average of 22% course section offerings with ZTC, along with eight known ZTC credentials, including two four-year Baccalaureate degrees. As ZTC has grown, so have the needs to support the initiative, needs which required reaching out to other departments.

This presentation will give participants a practical and concrete look into how we manage the various parts of the ZTC program daily. As the program continues to grow, we continually examine our process to see how to improve and simplify as much as possible. We will for example discuss how students are made aware of the existence of ZTC courses, such as through the ZTC marker in Banner, as well as through our Student Ambassador Pilot and a social media campaign in collaboration with the Kwantlen Student Association.

We will also show how we collect data on ZTC courses; a new and improved process that involves collaboration with the Registrar’s Office, Deans, and the Office of Planning and Accountability.

We continually strive to grow the number of ZTC courses and programs. In order to ensure the availability of ZTC options for students in all areas of study, we have adjusted our grant structure to specifically target courses lacking in ZTC options. In addition, the Library and liaison librarians support ZTC classes in several ways, for example with a scanning service, assistance in finding relevant open materials, providing library materials with unlimited simultaneous users, as well as added options to improve accessibility of materials.

Lastly, we will provide a glimpse into our future plans, such as the creation of a Low Textbook Cost marker in addition to ZTC, how to future increase student awareness of both those programs, and our search for a new method for tracking OER Adoptions across KPU.



Included in [Session 10E]: Social Justice

Author Keywords
zero textbook cost program, open education policies and strategies, sustainability

“An area of HE activity that is highly inequitable is the provision of expensive fully copyrighted print-based textbooks” (Cox, Masuku and Willmers: 2020).

Open educational resources (OER) have gained traction in many parts of the world, through their expression as open textbooks. South Africa is no exception when it comes to proclaiming their commitment to such open practice. The Open Learning Policy Framework for South African Post-School Education and Training commits higher education (HE) to such pursuits (Department: Higher Education and Training, 2017). As well as this national commitment, literature clearly demonstrates that open textbooks have the potential to disrupt the trajectory of exclusion in South African Higher Education by addressing issues of cost.

Open textbooks are also seen as a solution to variable quality of educational resources as well as addressing social injustice through increased access to learning materials (Cox et al., 2020; Hodgkinson-Williams & Arinto, 2017). The Digital Open Textbooks for Development (DOT4D) Project found that open textbooks “addressed economic, cultural, and political in justices faced by their students, issues not considered by traditional textbooks” (OER Africa, 2024). However, not much is known about the use of open textbooks in South African Higher education, especially in Accounting education and more specifically taxation education. Taxation is the focus of this study because of its content uniqueness to specific countries based on regional tax law.

In addition to the geographical uniqueness annual amendments to Tax Acts necessitate the continual updating of some content. Most universities in South Africa prescribe textbooks for undergraduate taxation modules (Department: Higher Education and Training, 2020). For all the reasons provided above and others reported in literature on open textbooks, this study aims to explore the use of open textbooks in Taxation. The challenge is that for the use of a taxation open textbooks to be sustainable, someone needs to take responsibility for updating for annual changes. Currently this function is performed by various commercial publishers who pay authors to do this.

The paper will report on a study focused on exploring the use of open textbooks in tax education. The paper will first report on a scoping review on the use of open textbooks in business education globally. The overarching question was: How are open textbooks used in business education? Following the scoping review, the study surveyed undergraduate taxation lecturers at South African universities to garner their perceptions regarding the use of open textbooks with the intention of introducing the use of open textbooks in tax education. The paper will report on the findings of this survey and more specifically identifying the challenges that need to be mitigated so that open textbooks or a sustainable alternative that speaks to increased access to learning materials and lower costs, can be introduced in the South African taxation education arena.



Included in [Session 10A]: Practice and Policy in OE

References
Cox, G., Masuku, B., & Willmers, M. (2020). Open textbooks and social justice: Open educational practices to address economic, cultural and political injustice at the University of Cape Town. Department: Higher Education and Training. (2017). Open Learning Policy Framework for Post-School Education and Training. (). https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201704/40772gon335.pdf Department: Higher education and Training. (2020). Students' Access to and Use of Learning Materials. Survey Report 2020. (). Pretoria: Department of Higher Education and Training. https://www.usaf.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/DHET_SAULM-Report-2020.pdf Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Arinto, P. (2017). Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South. African Minds. OER Africa. (2024). What are the benefits of open textbooks in the Global South? OER Africa. Retrieved 19 May 2024, from https://www.oerafrica.org/content/what-are-benefits-open-textbooks-global-south

Author Keywords
Open Textbooks, OER, Accounting (Taxation)Education, Higher Education

Our recent publication, an innovative open book, “Communication across Cultures”, designed to enhance intercultural competence, leverages culture as content and language as a medium to aim at facilitating effective communication in a context that may present cultural challenges.

This presentation will showcase how the book integrates interactive and collaborative tasks, employing H5P and reflective activities to create an engaging learning experience. This open book is structured in three modules to provide students with opportunities to immerse themselves in various cultural contexts through dynamic and various multimedia materials. By using videos, interactive quizzes, and discussions, this book addresses different learning styles, ensuring that individual students can connect with the content in a meaningful way.

The interactive tasks are not only informative but also encourage students to engage in critical thinking and self-reflection about their cultural assumptions and biases. These tasks in the modules are designed to be flexible and adaptable, allowing educators to tailor the content to their specific classroom needs. Moreover, this book serves as a prime example of how supplementary educational resources can be created using open educational resources (OERs). By maximising the use of OERs, we have curated a wealth of high-quality materials that educators can access and apply. This approach not only reduces the cost of educational resources but also fosters a culture of sharing and collaboration in the educational community.

Before introducing this book in the classroom, using an adapted usability testing framework, data were collected from the researcher’s notes, during participant interactions with the book during the workshop, six individual participants written comments and interviews with two participants, and feedback from three educators. The data were analysed using a usability matrix (Kessler & Plakans, 2001, p.8) with a focus on three aspects: design, navigation, and content.



Included in [Session 10D]: Open Texts (Workshops)

References
Kessler, G., & Plakans, L. (2001). Incorporating ESOL learners' feedback and usability testing in instructor-developed CALL materials. TESOL Journal, 10(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2001.tb00012.x

Author Keywords
Roles of technology, Open educational resources, Culture and language learning

Calling all Australasian OEPSIG members, and Down UndOER authors! This meet-up will take place in the Courtyard over lunch (look for the Wombat banner), and be a chance to network, and meet in person.

Since changing roles from CEO to Head of Research at Moodle, Martin has had a lot more time in the past year to go deeper into new technologies and especially to study how they might affect education in general.

This presentation will cover:

- the long-term trends he's seeing around education and where that will probably take us in the next ten years and more.
- the main trends for the future of the Moodle platform, particularly for incorporating AI
- A discussion about a potentially important OER project for Open Education Global, on which your feedback is sought.

Included in [Session 11A]: Artificial Intelligence

The Driving OER Sustainability for Student Success (DOERS) Collaborative was an organization that began in 2018 through a partnership of three higher education systems. The organization’s original goals included facilitation of partnerships among system, state, and consortial open education programs. As of 2024, the DOERS collaborative has built out conversations and deliverables which build organizational excellence through sustainability and infrastructure, advance open education impact through advocacy and demonstrating value, and enhance member capacity through sharing, collaboration, and leadership. Each of these strategic goals help strengthen collaboration and quality education by supporting open as everyone’s business.

This presentation will share the perspectives and experiences of a panel of the 2024 DOERS steering committee as they continue to build on the work accomplished since 2018. Participants will have the opportunity to explore the OER Equity Blueprint, discover how institutions of higher education in the US and Canada have incorporated open practice into retention, promotion and tenure process, and hear how the growing organization has collaboratively enacted strategic planning sessions to build bylaws and enhance organizational structure.

This session will also share out a call for proposals for the DOERS open education research case study collection, describe how DOERS is supporting student success through open practices and microcredentials, and relate how the organization plans to build the leadership capacity of its representatives.



Included in [Session 11B]: Sustainability

Author Keywords
Access, Community Impact, Micro-credentialing, Open education policies and strategies, Sustainability

Slides can be found here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13WXC0JCXBQ9sTPka1P9r9d3zKdh3aPX0q-EmCdc39eA/edit?usp=sharing 

The definition of open educational practices (OEP) is ever changing in the open education community, and recent years has seen this definition shift to encompass pedagogical practices that have less of a focus on OER and focus on advancing social justice in our classroom spaces (Cronin & MacLaren, 2018; Croft & Brown, 2020). However, the discussion falls short when talking about student assessment in a course, and as a result, grading practices often come in direct conflict with the ideals and values that underpin OEP.

Because OEP has a strong focus on student autonomy and empowerment, it results in a shift in the traditional relationship between student and instructor, usually with a focus on knowledge creation, but we would argue that shift can and does occur when employing collaborative grading practices (ungrading) where students have input and can discuss their learning and the resulting grade in the course with the instructor. Students themselves have a much better sense of the work they have put into a course and as a result, a much better sense of their learning in a course. Traditional grading systems have been shown to not be reliable when measuring student learning and to also perpetuate harm on students in the process. Because employing OEP in the classroom requires developing a relationship of trust between instructors and students, those traditional grading practices can and do create conflict.

In addition, traditional grading practices can expand the equity gap, disproportionally harming students that come from underserved populations. As a basic example, simple averaging of grades across a term will favor students that were better prepared at the beginning for the course in question, despite students being at the same point at the end of the term. There is no room in this system to account for the differences in the learning gains. Here, we argue that collaborative grading practices seek to advance representational justice (Lambert, 2018), giving students power and voice to their own experiences in the classroom, and taking into consideration their experiences outside of the classroom as well.

In this session, I will argue that because collaborative grading practices challenge traditional teaching practices and are rooted in constructivist and connectivist pedagogies, it should be considered an open educational practice, decoupled from the creation of OER.

Included in [Session 11C]: WIL and Microcredentials

References
Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156-170.

Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open praxis, 10(2), 127-143.

Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis) course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3).

Author Keywords
Alternative Assessment, Ungrading, Collaborative Grading, Open Educational Practice, Social Justice, Equity

The advancement of open education and widespread adoption of Open Educational Resources (OER) requires more than individual institutional efforts—it demands coordinated action and shared expertise across institutions and regions. This panel explores how collaborative organisations like the Open Education Network (OEN) and the Council of Australian University Librarians' (CAUL) OER Collective serve as crucial enablers in the open education ecosystem, creating economies of scale and fostering communities of practice that accelerate OER adoption.

Through examining these organisations' approaches, we will discuss how centralised support structures and collaborative frameworks amplify local efforts and create sustainable change. The Open Education Network's work in building a community of practice among academic libraries has demonstrated how shared expertise and resources can lower barriers to OER adoption across institutions. Similarly, CAUL's OER Collective showcases how a coordinated, national approach can pool resources effectively to create and adapt high-quality open materials while building capacity across the higher education sector.

The panel will address key questions about the role of networks in advancing open education: How do collaborative organisations effectively balance central coordination with local autonomy? What strategies have proven most successful in building sustainable communities of practice? How can networks leverage their collective power to address common challenges in OER adoption? What metrics and evidence demonstrate the impact of collaborative approaches?

Drawing from practical experiences, panellists will explore how these networks create value through shared infrastructure, professional development, advocacy, and resource creation. The session will offer insights into successful models of collaboration that can be adapted across different contexts while examining future opportunities for scaling open education through networked approaches.

The panel will comprise:

* Dr Danny Kingsley, Deakin University (facilitator)
* David Ernst, Open Education Network
* Karen Lauritsen, Open Education Netowrk
* Dr Kathy Essmiller, Oklahoma State University
* Fiona Salisbury, Western Sydney University and Council of Australian University Librarians
* Dr Kate Tickle, Council of Australian University Librarians
* Ruth Cameron, The University of Newcastle

This panel presentation is an expansion to the research presentation, “Toward a more sustainable open education community: Breaking through barriers to bridge primary, secondary, and tertiary open practices”. We suggest that even though Open Educational Practices (OEP) are supported and implemented differently across these sectors, working together as boundary spanners (Walz & Farley, 2023) can be a productive contribution to OEP sustainability. Addressing this gap is important to providing equitable quality education to all which is a UN Sustainable Development Goal. The panelists in this presentation were strategically selected to represent diverse perspectives across educational sectors (primary/secondary teacher librarian, tertiary/Higher Education librarians, Teacher Education faculty, Professional Staff, and state-level Government Leader). They will discuss commonalities and differences in their OEP work, perceived barriers, and opportunities, and share concrete examples where bridging the gap has positively impacted OEP implementation and advancement in their communities.

Some of the barriers that challenge boundary spanning include a lack of OEP and OER awareness (at all levels), including not understanding the need for OEP and OER in the first place. Copyright fears and gatekeeping around ownership and sharing materials prohibit engagement and, in some regions, primary and secondary teachers are required to obtain permission to openly license and publicly share their work. Where OEP does bridge primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors, inequities persist regarding how a contributor is compensated for their work, putting at risk the sustainability of these partnerships. From a governance perspective, stakeholder turnover at the state or provincial level is challenging to move this work forward. Widespread uncertainty regarding budget availability also threatens the sustainability of this work.

This panel, however, is optimistic that by working together, we can impact the sustainability of OEP by empowering multi-level awareness and engagement. Panelists agree that the first step is to work towards policy that permits teachers, especially K-12 teachers, to engage in OEP. Furthermore, understanding and valuing one another's contributions is key; one potential solution is through common language about OEP that honors and recognizes this work, especially at primary and secondary levels. Panelists will also share their observations regarding the “Teacherpreneuer” mindset, where teachers could work as educational leaders and policymakers to incentivize and grow OEP engagement instead of commodifying teaching resources. Where copyright fears and debates around ownership keep educators from engaging, Creative Commons licenses provide a “third space” by shifting the focus from ownership to one of access, equity, and impact. Finally, panelists will discuss opportunities to bridge OEP across sectors through adopting and adapting open curricula and by collaborating in projects that require multi-level engagement.



Included in [Session 4B]: Sustainability

References
Walz, A., & Farley, J. (2023). Making Open Educational Resources with and for PreK12: A Collaboration Toolkit for Higher Education. Virginia Tech Libraries. Retrieved May 1, 2024 from https://doi.org/10.21061/OER_PreK12_highered

Author Keywords
Open educational practices across diverse levels, Policy and governance, Enabling transferability of knowledge and practice, Primary and secondary education policy, Sustainability, Overcoming barriers

Research concentrating on open education often focuses on the processes of production and storage for open educational resources (OER), methods of learning design and instruction (open-enabled pedagogies), barriers and enablers to practice, or the resulting outcomes for students such as cost savings or achievement. Practitioner-focused research tends toward narrow scope and circumstance and is usually concerned with bounded activities that do not holistically capture the practitioner-in-environment, or explore the localised effects of environment on practice. Engagement with open educational practices (OEP) is predicated on a complex web of inter-connected, and inter-dependant factors and situating the practitioner in an environment of practice – henceforth the Ecology of Open Practice – provides an opportunity to deeply explore the influences (both positive and negative) that affect individual and institutional manifestations of OEP.

This presentation reports on research using a mixed methods approach, administering a quantitative survey and applying initial analysis to qualitative semi-structured interviews with key staff at three case study sites. The resulting thick description from active practitioners, coupled with institutional history, policy, and procedure documentation, learning and teaching practices, and partnerships provides a case site narrative through which the Ecology of Open Educational Practice emerges. The resulting ecological framework provides a rationale for localised practice, and identifies both opportunities and challenges for each site.

Commonality emerged across the case sites, particularly relating to practitioner values as underpinning practice, the degree to which practitioners exhibited open fluency, the mediating effects of support for OEP, the role of policy, and the state of the national higher education landscape as it affects local learning and teaching. The major themes were mapped against Bronfenbrenner’s Ecology of Human Development (1979) to provide a framework for each site.

The approach employed by this research is a transferable framework for understanding OEP, and its strength lies in unearthing contextual factors. The research is situated in the Australia higher education context, yet nothing impedes implementation in other settings or countries. Bronfenbrenner’s work has not previously been applied to OEP, but the outcomes of this research articulate and illustrate its use as a framework for deep inquiry.

Arising from this research is a reinforcement of the inter-connectedness of institutional and national influences on OEP, and the limitations of siloed, isolated initiatives to support OEP. Policy implementation without communication or embedded support, institutional strategy that causes values-based dissonance for practitioners, learning and teaching support mechanisms demarcated – and disconnected - by organisational unit lines, and government-mandated performance-based funding models inconsistent with the values of higher education all emerged as influences present at the institution, yet ineffective and inefficient due to a lack of coherency across institutional teams and stakeholders. Open educational practices – situated within the Ecology – require an acknowledgement of a wider stakeholder base as the effects, support for, and outcomes of OEP permeate the institution.

Ultimately, this research takes the stance that OEP in higher education is ‘everyone’s business’, and provides a framework for authentic engagement with long-term activities to build flourishing ecologies of open practice.



Included in [Session 11D]: OEP in Higher Education (Workshops)

References
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Author Keywords
Open educational practices, Higher education, Ecological model

AI pervades various facets of society, including education. In the open education domain, the notion of open AI, distinct from the entity OpenAI, is attracting attention. However, the precise connotations of "open" in conjunction with "AI" remain subject to diverse interpretations, reflecting conceptual tensions and longstanding differences around concepts of “open” in respective domains.

In a blog post last year, prominent edtech expert David Wiley wrote, “when people talk about whether or not generative AI should be “open,” they could be talking about whether the foundation models should be open, whether the modified model weights that result from fine-tuning should be open, and/or whether the prompts (which includes templates, embeddings, etc.) should be open” (Wiley, 2023). In a similar direction, focusing on licensing for different aspects of AI technology, the Open Source Initiative are currently developing an “open-source AI” definition (Open Source Initiative, 2024). On the other hand, in broader literature, definitions of open education and open technology encompass a wide range of concepts, where “open” could mean: “ethical” (Holmes et al., 2022), “inclusive” and “innovative” (Bozkurt, 2023), “co-created” and “learner-driven” (Walberg and Thomas, 1972), “non-proprietary” (Berners-Lee, 2023), “decentralised” (Crowston and Howison, 2005), “accessible without barriers” (Knox, 2013), “available to join”, “shared”, “not tightly controlled” (Weller, 2020), “available in the public domain or under an open license” (UNESCO, 2022), “interpretable” and “visible” (Conati, Porayska-Pomsta, and Mavrikis, 2018), and many others.

This indicates that “open AI” and “open-source AI” are overlapping but not identical concepts. “Open-source AI” seems to be about the tangible aspects of systems, whereas “open AI” is broader and potentially includes context of how systems can be used, who can use them, and what for. Rather than trying to resolve these debates into a single taxonomy/typology, we propose a meronomic, holistic account of openness in AI education which explores the relationship between definitions with respect to part-whole relationships. This will facilitate diverse contributions and critical discussion.

In this panel session, participants will have the opportunity to engage in the panel discussion and ask questions regarding the dimensions of openness of AI in education.

The agenda includes:

• 10 minutes: introductions, pre-recorded 1-slide lightning presentations from experts, panel reactions
• 10 minutes: panel interaction and debate
• 15 minutes: Q&A with panel members based on thoughts submitted by the audience (with backup questions prepared by the moderators).
• 5 minutes: closing discussion and synthesis.

Experts who agreed to contribute so far include David Wiley, Anne-Marie Scott, Aras Bozkurt, Chrissi Nerantzi and Leo Havemann. Some of them might join virtually. They will be provided with prompts ahead of time for their initial statements. Robert Farrow, an experienced moderator, will chair the panel discussion. During the discussion, delegates will be able to contribute reflections and questions through a back channel and these will be integrated into the discussion.

Included in [Session 11A]: Artificial Intelligence

References

Berners-Lee, T. (2023). Frequently asked questions by the Press – Tim BL (w3.org). Available at https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/FAQ.html (Accessed: 2 May 2024)

Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative AI, Synthetic Contents, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP): A New Front in the Openness Landscape. Open Praxis, 15(3), pp. 178–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.579

Conati, C., Porayska-Pomsta, K. and Mavrikis, M., 2018. AI in Education needs interpretable machine learning: Lessons from Open Learner Modelling. arXiv preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00154

Crowston, K. and Howison, J. (2005). The social structure of Free and Open Source software development. First Monday, Volume 10, Number 2 - 7 February 2005 Available at: https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/1207/1127 (Accessed: 2 May 2024)

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S.B., Santos, O.C., Rodrigo, M.T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I.I. and Koedinger, K.R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp.1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1

Knox, J. (2013). Five critiques of the open educational resources movement. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), pp. 821–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.774354

Open Source Initiative (2024). The Open Source AI Definition – draft v. 0.0.8. Available at: https://opensource.org/deepdive/drafts/the-open-source-ai-definition-draft-v-0-0-8 (Accessed: 2 May 2024)

UNESCO (2022). Understanding Open Science. UNESDOC Digital Library. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54677/UTCD9302

Walberg, H.J. and Thomas, S.C. (1972). Open education: An operational definition and validation in Great Britain and United States. American Educational Research Journal, 9(2), pp.197-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312009002197

Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Athabasca University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771993050.01

Wiley, D. (2023). An analogy for understanding what it means for generative AI to be “Open”. Open Content. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/7289

Author Keywords
Open AI, Open-source AI, Artificial Intelligence, Open data, Open-source technical platforms

In September 2023 (another) high school opened with an explicit goal to teach with, produce and learn with Open Educational Resources. The Itz’at STEAM Academy (ISA) in Belize opened to its first form (grade) of students in September 2023 as an OER focused high school. The development of ISA benefitted from over two decades of history and experience from leaders in the open education movement.

ISA’s development is led by three organizations, the school, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology (Belize) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Massachusetts, USA). MIT is well known internationally for its leadership in OER (MIT Open CourseWare) and a strong focus on STEAM education. MIT worked with Mountain Heights Academy (MHA, Utah, USA) to build a(nother) OER high school. MHA, originally the Open High School of Utah, was founded with a focus on the use and production of OER. Founded in 2009, MHA serves U.S. grades 7-12, has award winning teachers and is a leader in digital education and utilizing OER.

This session will describe the path from the launch of MIT OpenCourseWare through the founding of Mountain Heights Academy to the development and launch of Itz’at STEAM Academy. The session will describe how the growth of and experiences of MHA (Tonks et al. 2013; Tonks 2022) set the foundation for the OER policies at ISA (Itz’at STEAM Academy 2022), how the OER policies of ISA are contextualized for its success and the initial use of and development of OER at ISA. And it will describe the potential of OER at ISA to serve as a model for project based and transdisciplinary learning in secondary education in Belize.



Included in [Session 11B]: Sustainability

References
Tonks, D., Weston, S., Wiley, D., & Barbour, M. (2013). “Opening” a new kind of school: The story of the Open High School of Utah. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. (14)1, 255-271.

Tonks, D. (2022). La evolución del primer bachillerato con un currículum de recursos abiertos. Revista Mexicana De Bachillerato A Distancia, 14(27). Itz’at STEAM Academy. (2022). Open Educational Resources Policy.

Author Keywords
Open Educational Resources, OER, K-12, High School, OER Policy

Although micro-credentials are gaining traction in higher education, more particularly for students who want short, practical, and up-to-date courses for upskilling themselves, there is an ongoing challenge regarding the recognition of micro-credentials by various stakeholders. This has an implication on the portability of micro-credentials should a student wish to transfer or translate credentials from one context to another (Chakroun & Keevy, 2018). Literature shows that some higher education institutions prefer to stake their own micro-credentials to make up a macro-credential or qualification, while others at the least, offer micro-credentials as a pre-cursor course for students looking to enter a diploma or a degree (Varadarajan, Koh & Daniel, 2023).

The portability of courses and credit transfer between contexts (institutions) is not a new issue for South Africa thus, the micro-credentials are increasing this complexity. The Council of Higher Education (CHE) acknowledges that the development of a micro-credentialing policy and strategy is at its infancy but in the meantime, entrusts institutional structures with the micro-credentials’ quality assurance and integrity. The CHE allows firstly, that credit bearing modules that are part of a formal qualification but that are taken for non-degree purposes (NDP) can be recognised as micro-credentials in formal qualifications through Credit Accumulation and Transfer (CAT) mechanisms. Secondly, micro-credentials can be recognised through their inclusion in an assessed portfolio of evidence for Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) for access and/or advanced standing into formal qualifications (CHE Communiqué 2 of 2023, p. 2).

In this paper, I describe how the principles of social justice have informed the design of the Postgraduate Diploma in Blended and Online Learning Design (BOLD). As a means of advancing social justice imperatives, at the university of Cape Town, we are piloting both approaches: using micro-credentials for CAT and RPL. The BOLD PGDip development team has developed the programme (with four 30 credit clusters comprising three 10 credit courses each = 120 credits), which is at the final stages of the accreditation process. As a means of widening access to the courses for lifelong learning, each of the 10 credit courses will be offered for NDP, as short courses to anyone (with a learning design mandate) who wishes to upskill themselves, but should one decide to pursue the PGDip at a later stage, they will be allowed to use these credentials for CAT – this can be up to 50% of the PGDip only. One of short courses, Designing with Artificial Intelligence is being piloted in 2024. At the same time, to enhance access and inclusion, those who do not meet the PGDip entry requirements through their formal qualifications but have relevant work experience, we will use RPL to consolidate their informal learning. In addition to that, they will have to take a short course packaged by the team. This will also be showcased to the participants.



Included in [Session 11C]: WIL and Microcredentials

References
Chakroun, B., & Keevy, J. (2018). Digital credentialing: implications for the recognition of learning across borders. Published United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France, under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/)

Council of Higher Education (2023). Communiqué 2 of 2023. Available: https://www.che.ac.za/#/main

Varadarajan, S., Koh, J. H. L., & Daniel, B. K. (2023). A systematic review of the opportunities and challenges of micro-credentials for multiple stakeholders: learners, employers, higher education institutions and government. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 13.

Author Keywords
Access, Inclusivity, Lifelong and informal learning, Micro-credentialing and micro-credentials, Social justice

In recent years, Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU) has made significant strides in ensuring that its Open Educational Resources (OERs) are accessible to all learners. This presentation outlines our efforts, challenges, and strategies in addressing accessibility within our OER publishing workflows. We will also touch upon the next steps we plan to take to further enhance accessibility of our publications.

In 2022, KPU Open collaborated with a co-op student to develop an accessibility rubric aligned with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). The goal was to evaluate the accessibility of KPU's Pressbooks catalogue, which hosts a diverse range of OERs. The rubric served as a critical tool for assessing various aspects of accessibility, including text structure, alt text, multimedia content, and layout design.

The student meticulously evaluated 29 OERs using the newly created rubric. Unfortunately, the results revealed several common accessibility gaps: - Heading Structure: Many OERs lacked a consistent and well-organized heading structure, making it challenging for users to navigate content effectively. - Text Emphasis: Overreliance on bold or italicized text for conveying meaning led to inconsistencies and hindered comprehension. - Alt Text Mismatch: Images often had alt text that did not accurately describe their content, limiting accessibility for visually impaired users. - Tables and Captions: Some OERs contained layout tables without proper headers, and videos featured auto-generated, unedited captions.

Across the 29 books assessed, the accessible design success ranged from intermittent (level 1) to marginal (level 2)

Following the assessment, KPU's Open Publishing Suite (OPUS) implemented several measures to enhance OER accessibility: - Accessibility Statement: KPU created a clear and explicit accessibility statement for its website, emphasizing the importance of OER accessibility. - Student Assistant Training: Open Education Student Assistants now receive training in accessibility standards along with the rest of their training. Equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills, they contribute to making OERs more accessible during the creation process by being able to spot and fix accessibility issues immediately when doing the initial conversion. - OER Grant Application: The grant application process now includes a question specifically asking how applicants plan to address accessibility in their OER projects. This proactive step encourages thoughtful consideration of accessibility from the outset. - Project Agreements: OPUS revised its Project Agreements with OER Grant recipients, explicitly discussing common accessibility pitfalls identified during the assessment. This ensures that creators are aware of potential issues and can plan accordingly. - Pre-Publication Accessibility Review: An accessibility review is now part of the pre-publication checklist. By catching any oversights early, KPU aims to minimize accessibility gaps in its OERs.

KPU's commitment to accessibility extends beyond compliance—it reflects a dedication to equitable learning experiences. As the university continues to refine its OER publishing workflows, it remains steadfast in its mission to make education accessible to all.



Included in [Session 11C]: WIL and Microcredentials

Author Keywords
accessibility, OER publication, publishing processes

Building on the success of North American open practitioners, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand are rapidly developing their understanding and capacity for open educational practices as key to empowering equitable access to education and enhancing the student learning experience.

A significant outcome of this growth is the development of the open text Open Education Down UndOER: Australasian Case Studies. The text promotes inclusivity, accessibility, diversity, and equity in open education. This session marks the official launch of this critical text, showcasing the open educational practices of academics, information professionals, and learning and teaching teams, with a view to inspire educators and institutions to embrace open practices through practical, succinct case studies. In addition, it fosters an open education learning network which will be extended to encompass the audience during this interactive session, as “Open is Everyone’s Business”.

Participants will:
• Hear from Down UndOER authors and gain key insights into the experience of putting a case study together
• Apply the lessons learned in selected case studies to their own contexts using a guided worksheet

Participants can also review additional case studies in the book and follow the same process.

The presenters look forward to engaging with the audience and sharing the official interactive launch of Open Education Down UndOER: Australasian Case Studies!

About Open Education Down UndOER: Australasian Case Studies

This text is the result of a strong partnership between two groups:
• Australasian Open Educational Practice Special Interest Group (OEP SIG), a community-driven group leading the open education movement in Australasia, and
• Open Educational Resources Collective (OER Collective), an initiative led by the Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL), leveraging the strength of networks within university libraries in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

The text is published on the shared open publishing platform (Pressbooks) managed by CAUL, the peak industry body for university libraries in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. One facet of CAUL’s leadership strategy is to build infrastructure and capacity to move the open education agenda forward at a national and regional level through active communities of practice, evolving guides, events, and an annual open textbook grant program.

Included in [Session 11D]: OEP in Higher Education (Workshops)

Author Keywords
Inclusion, diversity, equity, access, Open access publishing, Open educational practices, Open practitioners, Open textbooks

The burgeoning integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT into the fabric of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has highlighted a promising new direction for enhancing automated essay assessment processes. This research delves into the practical implementation of LLMs for evaluating student essays within MOOC frameworks, focusing primarily on exploring advanced prompt engineering strategies.

We investigate a spectrum of methodologies, including few-shot learning, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, and fine-tuning techniques, to discern the most effective strategies for harnessing the capabilities of LLMs in this educational domain. Drawing from the latest advancements in natural language processing (NLP), our study examines the ability of LLMs to deliver accurate, efficient, and scalable assessments of student submissions.

MOOCs typically host hundreds to thousands of students per course, presenting significant logistical challenges regarding assignment evaluation. The volume of essays that require assessment can be overwhelming for instructors, making it virtually impossible to provide detailed, timely feedback without technological assistance. The deployment of LLMs promises not only to enhance the grading efficiency and maintain consistency in evaluation standards across large cohorts.

The primary objective of this study is to explore the application of generative AI (GAI) in assisting with essay grading, utilizing open courses hosted at ewant, the largest MOOCs platform run by National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU) in Taiwan . This course, "Required Credits for University Students - Emotional Education" is taught by Professor Chen Fei-Chuan at National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan. Since its first delivery in 2015, this course has been offered 137 times, with nearly 20,000 students enrolled. From both qualitative and quantitative perspectives, this course represents an optimal choice for the study, offering substantial potential for further research and development. Assignments in this course predominantly involve open-ended questions without standard answers, encouraging students to reflect, discuss, share, and synthesize their personal experiences based on the knowledge acquired during the course. This type of unstructured assignment is better suited for introducing GAI than structured assignments in science and engineering courses with definitive answers.

This research aims to leverage a data-driven approach to develop a GAI system that replicates the grading standards and performance of the instructors or teaching assistants (graders), thereby assisting future educators in efficiently grading large volumes of written assignments. By analyzing the strengths and drawbacks of multiple prompt engineering and fine-tuning methods in automating essay evaluations, the study aims to establish a dataflow pipeline for AI-assisted essay grading, with the expectation of generalizing this process to other courses of a similar nature. Additionally, this research proposes recommendations for designing more effective and scalable automated essay assessment systems tailored for contemporary online education platforms.

Overall, this study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential of LLMs in transforming the landscape of essay assessment in MOOCs, thereby contributing valuable insights into the optimization of educational technologies in a GAI era.



Included in [Session 11A]: Artificial Intelligence

References
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 1877-1901.

Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35, 22199-22213.

Min, S., Lyu, X., Holtzman, A., Artetxe, M., Lewis, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022). Rethinking the role of demonstrations: What makes in-context learning work?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12837.

Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., ... & Le, Q. V. (2021). Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01652.

Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Xia, F., Chi, E., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824-24837.

Author Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models, Prompt Engineering, Assessment, MOOCs

Learning in communities aligns with the concept of continuous learning which is relevant for the Dutch defense organization. A concept of openness supports, in-company communities of practice co-creating online modules and learning materials accessible and (re)usable to any employee in the organization via an online platform called The Open Defence Academy. Although from a traditional point of view learning begins when professionals are able to engage with modules and learning materials, this participative action research has its focus on learning in communities through collaborative design processes and expressed in terms of value.

Both communities of practice and social learning spaces are valuable theoretical concepts that help with building the framework for this research. They offer a lens to describe and research learning through participation in social practices. It allows a unique perspective on work-related processes as being perceived as learning processes. Collaborations in design groups for open modules and learning materials offer insights into the dynamics of these groups, their formation and processes that lead to learning, or can even undermine learning.

The theoretical concepts of communities of practice and social learning spaces are positioned in a context of openness. A contemporary perspective on openness in education offers opportunities for community involvement in design- and dissemination activities of learning materials. Due to perspectives on openness, the dichotomy between formal, nonformal and informal learning becomes permeable which offers opportunities to rephrase learning into terms of value. The development of value in collaborative module design groups appears through a continuous process of participation which implies learning. Value is a product of this participatory process and is developed due to the existence of agency among participants and their ability to negotiate meaning. It is expressed in terms of immediate-, potential-, applied- and realized value.

With a multiple methods approach, learning through collaborative design in groups of stakeholders is explored and mapped supported by the value creation framework. These methods are mainly qualitative and involve interviews, focus group sessions, visual representations created on MIRO boards and notes from the researcher’s reflexive journal. The focus group questions and interview questions are developed and inspired on the critical incident technique. Expansion of learning in the wider communities is explored using a questionnaire send to those in the communities who got involved in (online) activities regarding the design process, for example discussions, brainstorm sessions or script writing.



Included in [Session 2B]: Sustainability

Author Keywords
Open Educational Practices, Workplace learning, Lifelong and informal learning

The conference closes with a panel discussion and reflection from our conference keynote speakers, Siobhan Leachman, Penny Jane Burke, Martin Dougiamas, and GO-GN Rep.

And join us in celebrating the closing session of OEGlobal 2024.