The open education (OE) movement and scholarly literature, including UNESCO's (2019) Recommendation on OER, make frequent reference to the importance of developing supportive policy environments to allow OER and other open practices to thrive. In the higher education (HE) context, much of the policy needs to be made at the institutional level, but is this happening?
This presentation will report findings from a doctoral study investigating the relationship between OE and related policies, at the institutional level in HE. The study aims to discover in what ways open educational practices (OEP) are understood, supported or enabled in institutional policy - therefore, the concepts of both OE and policy are considered in a wide sense. OE can be described as a wide umbrella term, which can potentially refer to many practices across formal, informal and non-formal education (Weller et al., 2018). ‘Institutional policy’ is considered to include documented policies, strategies, regulations or guidelines, but also, more informally, usual courses of action, presence of expertise, infrastructure, or funding to support relevant activities (Atenas et al, 2020).
This study is particularly focused on the intentions and effects of institutional policies, in higher education, on the following areas of practice in particular: · use, creation, sharing and adaptation of OER - for example, open textbooks, or other openly licensed and freely available content items such as documents, slides, videos, images, or datasets. · offering of free and/or lower-cost online courses - for example, MOOCs or microcredentials. · opening up of aspects of learning, teaching and assessment to external participants, partners and audiences - for example, open publication of student-generated content as OER. · participating in open professional development communities - for example, using blogs, podcasts or tweetchats for sharing and discussion of practices.
In order to investigate how policy, broadly defined, interacts with a similarly broadly understood range of practices, three research strands have been employed in order to investigate 1) the content of policy texts, 2) the views and experiences of staff members working in institutions, and finally, 3) the particular perspectives of a subgroup of staff who have had a role in developing relevant policy.
The first and second strands have uncovered wide variety in institutional approaches to OE, ranging from the very engaged to those which show little awareness. OER tends to be the aspect most discussed by policies and staff members, but institutions also evidence varying degrees of involvement with the other forms of practice. There is widespread evidence of more informal forms of policy support, but lower prevalence of documented OE policies. If documented policies can be taken as evidence of sustained institutional commitment to enable and support practices, then this low prevalence is perhaps cause for concern. This presentation will focus on findings from the third strand involving policymakers, and the emphasis they place on the specificity of the local, while situated within globalised and national policy contexts.
Included in
[Session 6A]: Practice and Policy in OEReferencesAtenas, J;
Havemann, L; Neumann, J. and Stefanelli, C (2020).
Open Education Policies: Guidelines for co-creation. London: Open Education Policy Lab.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4032993Weller, M., Jordan, K., DeVries, I., & Rolfe, V. (2018). Mapping the open education landscape: citation network analysis of historical open and distance education research. Open Praxis, 10(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.5944/OPENPRAXIS.10.2.822
Author Keywordsopen education policies, higher education institutions, institutional policies, open educational practices
